Objective: The present study was designed to discuss the practicability and value of stepwise small dural window and Paine's point puncture mediated external intraventricular drainage (EID) for craniectomy in patients with severe brain injury compared with standard trauma craniectomy. Methods: Ninety patients with an Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 8 or less were randomly divided into two groups: standard trauma craniectomy group (44 patients, control group) and stepwise small dural window and Paine 's point puncture mediated EID group (46 patients, improved group) and the clinical data were compared. Results: The improved group had no statistically significance with control group on duration of surgery and the incidence of intracranial infection (p=0.732, 0.774). However, the improved group had statistically significance with control group on the incidence of intraoperative encephalocele, postoperative delayed hematoma, postoperative epilepsy and hydrocephalus in need of extra surgery (P=0.007、0.020、0.014、0.011). Glasgow outcome score (GOS) comparison half a year later showed that the control group had 17 cases of good prognosis, while the improved group had 29 cases, which had statistically significance (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Improved method proved to be an excellent technique on hematoma evacuation in craniectomy in patients with severe brain injury, especially in the prevention and treatment of intraoperative brain swelling, clearance of bloody cerebrospinal fluid and continuously reduce the intracranial pressure. A positive neurological outcome and decreased mortality was also observed in the improved group.