Coding Theory, Cryptography and Related Areas 2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-57189-3_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding Reed-Solomon Codes Beyond Half the Minimum Distance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heuristically, this fact could be related to [40,Proposition 12,page 9] which states that the probability of having more than one codeword in a Hamming ball, whose radius corresponds to the Sudan algorithm decoding radius, is close to zero. The degree d of F is related to the number c of codewords within the Hamming ball by c d. And, in practice, we observe that d is close to 1 when c = 1 with probability close to 1.…”
Section: Example 6 With R = ◗[[T]] Here Is the Trace Of Algorithm 5 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heuristically, this fact could be related to [40,Proposition 12,page 9] which states that the probability of having more than one codeword in a Hamming ball, whose radius corresponds to the Sudan algorithm decoding radius, is close to zero. The degree d of F is related to the number c of codewords within the Hamming ball by c d. And, in practice, we observe that d is close to 1 when c = 1 with probability close to 1.…”
Section: Example 6 With R = ◗[[T]] Here Is the Trace Of Algorithm 5 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this instance, Wu's algorithm using (22) computes s = 2, which is also the minimum multiplicity. Now Wu's algorithm computes M = 5 and ρ = 72 using (23) and (24), respectively. With these values, Wu's algorithm requires solving a system of N = 381 homogeneous equations involving U = 408 unknowns.…”
Section: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, n, with multiplicity s is an ideal I s . From this observation several authors including Alekhnovich [2], Nielsen and Høholdt [23], Kuijper and Polderman [16], O'Keeffe and Fitzpatrick [24], and Lee and O'Sullivan [19], formulated the interpolation step of the list decoding algorithm as the problem of finding the minimal weight polynomial from the ideal I s . Clearly the minimal weight polynomial will appear as the minimal polynomial in a minimal Gröbner basis of I s computed with respect to the corresponding weighted term order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each such polynomial is placed on the list. A solution to the interpolation problem exists if is strictly less than the number of monomials in such that is of minimal weighted degree [24]. A sufficient condition for a codeword to be on the GS generated list is [7], [9] (2) 1 To prevent notational ambiguity, kxk will denote the magnitude of x.…”
Section: Algebraic Soft Decodingmentioning
confidence: 99%