Decline in seminal quality in Indian men over the last 37 years

Abstract

BackgroundSince the first report of a decline in semen quality in 1974, there have been several reports of similar declines across populations. Despite some scattered reports of declining semen quality in the Indian sub-continent, comprehensive studies analyzing semen quality over the last few decades have not been undertaken. We undertook the present study to investigate the temporal trend in semen parameters in Indian populations over a period of 37 years (1979–2016).MethodsPublications providing semen analysis details for fertile and infertile men from the Indian sub-continent were collected by a thorough literature search. Semen quality data for 6466 normal fertile or presumptive normal men (from 119 studies/data sets) and 7020 infertile men (from 63 studies/data sets) published between 1979 and 2016 were retrieved. We undertook systematic review and quantitative analysis of mean sperm count, motility, normal morphology and other available parameters. Data were analyzed to estimate semen parameters reference values for Indian men and to assess temporal trends in infertile, fertile and all subjects.ResultsSeminal quality shows a decreasing temporal trend and the decrease is higher in infertile than fertile males. In pooled analysis for all individuals, significant (p < 0.05 or < 0.001) declines in sperm concentration and normal morphology are observed; however, isolated analysis for each group shows declines without statistical significance. The mean (± SD) semen volume, sperm concentration, total motility, rapid linear progressive motility, normal sperm morphology and sperm viability for Indian fertile men are 2.88 ± 0.77 ml, 81.08 ± 29.21 million/ml, 66.37 ± 10.95%, 52.64 ± 15.78%, 56.68 ± 20.23% and 72.63 ± 8.31%, respectively, whereas in infertile these are 3.07 ± 1.27 ml, 37.94 ± 26.41 million/ml, 40.22 ± 13.76%, 26.79 ± 15.47%, 36.41 ± 21.66% and 55.25 ± 11.99%, respectively. The mean seminal parameter values were significantly lower (p < 0.001) in infertile as compared to fertile men, except semen volume.ConclusionsSemen parameters in Indian men have declined with time and the deterioration is quantitatively higher in the infertile group. The study also provides reference values for semen parameters in Indian men.

Coenzyme Q10 effect on semen parameters: Profound or meagre?

“…Evidence suggest that semen quality has decreased significantly over the last 40 years (Mishra et al, 2018; Sengupta, Dutta, & Krajewska‐Kulak, 2017). Oxidative stress is established as a critical factor in male infertility pathophysiology with approximately 30–80 per cent of male infertility is considered to have contribution from high ROS (Showell et al, 2014).…”

Profiles of Emerging and Legacy Per-/Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Matched Serum and Semen Samples: New Implications for Human Semen Quality

“…Evidence suggests that human semen quality has declined worldwide over the last several decades (Carlsen et al 1992;Mishra et al 2018). In addition to adverse lifestyle factors such as cigarette smoking, alcohol and caffeine intake, obesity, stress, and high scrotal temperature (Ilacqua et al 2018;Sadeu et al 2010;Sharpe 2000), exposure to environmental contaminants is regarded as another important contributor (Mima et al 2018;Skakkebaek et al 2001).…”

A longitudinal study of semen quality among Chinese sperm donor candidates during the past 11 years

“…As far as we know, this is the first study on time trends in semen quality among Chinese men in Henan Province. Studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][23][24][25] suggest that semen quality is declining globally, however, the debate remains open due to the possible effects of ethnic and geographical differences. In contrast, several other studies have reported no significant change in semen quality [9][10][11][12] .…”

“…The annualized rate of decline in the total motility was lower than that reported in America (2% per year) 23 , but it was higher than that reported in Paris (0.6% per year) 2 and Marseille (0.4% per year) 4 . The possible reasons for the discrepancy are as follows: (1) small sample size are used in the previous study 10,11 ; (2) subjects in these studies are fertile men 2,3,11 or infertile men 5,21,25 ; (3) there are differences in lifestyle habits, ethnicity, and geographical regions [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][22][23][24][25] ; (4) the different study periods [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][22][23][24][25] .…”