1993
DOI: 10.2307/2526966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debt Buybacks Signal Sovereign Countries' Creditworthiness: Theory and Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that the IMF in particular is putting increased emphasis on enhancing members' access to international capital markets makes this a highly relevant investigation. 12 The second is that Acharya and Diwan (1993) have shown that a debtor buying back its debt might signal its willingness to invest to creditors. In order to concentrate on the multilaterals' strategic role I therefore assume that the country has no accumulated debt.…”
Section: Should There Be Multilateral Lending?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that the IMF in particular is putting increased emphasis on enhancing members' access to international capital markets makes this a highly relevant investigation. 12 The second is that Acharya and Diwan (1993) have shown that a debtor buying back its debt might signal its willingness to invest to creditors. In order to concentrate on the multilaterals' strategic role I therefore assume that the country has no accumulated debt.…”
Section: Should There Be Multilateral Lending?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The changing character of international financial markets has created a debate over the raison d'être of multilateral institutions such as the IMF and the World Bank. Given that the resources at their disposal are now dwarfed by the size of capital markets, do they still have a role to play in international lending?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, contracts between a debtor and its creditors forbid debtor governments to engage in these market buybacks without receiving special permission (Rotemberg, 1991), but in practise these transactions have been common. 1 Bulow and Rogo¤ (1988,1991) provide a formal statement of the critique to buybacks. They argue that buybacks, even at existing secondary prices ("average value," as in their paper) are a costly mistake for the debtor, and that the country should be prepared to pay no more than the "marginal" value of its debt, which the authors argue is much lower.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They argue that buybacks, even at existing secondary prices ("average value," as in their paper) are a costly mistake for the debtor, and that the country should be prepared to pay no more than the "marginal" value of its debt, which the authors argue is much lower. 2 Other authors, instead, see buybacks with favour: a di¤erent set of motives for buybacks is given, among the others, by Krugman (1989), Froot (1989), Rotemberg (1991), Acharya and Diwan (1993), Cohen and Verdier (1995), Thomas (1996), Marchesi and Thomas (1999).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation