2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1868934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debating as a Classroom Tool for Adapting Learning Outcomes to the European Higher Education Area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Someone other than the course teacher moderated the debate. Class members voted which group presented the most convincing arguments (see also Jiménez et al. , 2011; Oakley, 2012; Silberman, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Someone other than the course teacher moderated the debate. Class members voted which group presented the most convincing arguments (see also Jiménez et al. , 2011; Oakley, 2012; Silberman, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intent of the debate is to present the most convincing argument, which is achieved by listening carefully to what the other side is saying and developing or raising counterpoints to advance one’s own position. Either the moderator declares a winner or the debate teams can come together and debrief as they discuss which side presented the most convincing and sound arguments (Alghamdi & Al Dossari, 2021; Jiménez, Perdiguero, & Suárez, 2011; Mumtaz & Latif, 2017; Silberman, 2005).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants of this study were 44 Dutch students belonging to two classes at a secondary school in Rotterdam: a lower secondary class group (third grade) consisting of 25 students, including 12 males and 13 females (aged [14][15][16], and an upper secondary class group (fifth grade) consisting of 19 students including 7 males and 12 females (aged [16][17][18][19]. The first group was studying English at B1 level and the second group at B2 level.…”
Section: A Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%