1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1557(199603)5:2<95::aid-pds228>3.0.co;2-4
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Dealing with multiplicities in pharmacoepidemiologic studies
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
25
0
0
0
Citation Types
0
2
0
0
Year Published
1997
2013
Publication Types
Select...
22
2
1
Relationship
0
25
Authors
Journals
Cited by 25 publications
(2 citation statements)
References 0 publications
0
2
0
0
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The path between PEOU and BI were significant at the p < 0.05 level. The more tests performed on the same data set, the more likely it is that one will find significant results occurring by chance (what is called the problem of multiplicity [35]). To address this we have adjusted the α-values (the probability error rate, i.e.…”
Section: R 2 Values (In the Circles)
mentioning
confidence: 98%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The path between PEOU and BI were significant at the p < 0.05 level. The more tests performed on the same data set, the more likely it is that one will find significant results occurring by chance (what is called the problem of multiplicity [35]). To address this we have adjusted the α-values (the probability error rate, i.e.…”
Section: R 2 Values (In the Circles)
mentioning
confidence: 98%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The hypothesis was developed a priori and significance was taken at the 0.05 level, although we accept that overall inferences could be altered by applying a multiple testing procedure such as the Bonferroni adjustment or Holm's procedure. 33 Putative high-risk genotypes for increased susceptibility or poor outcome included GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null, and GSTM3 AA. High activity GSTP1 allelic variants are dependent on the substrate under study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
