1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1557(199603)5:2<95::aid-pds228>3.0.co;2-4
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Dealing with multiplicities in pharmacoepidemiologic studies

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
25
0
0
0

Citation Types

0
2
0
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
22
2
1

Relationship

0
25

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 25 publications

(2 citation statements)
references

References 0 publications

0
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The path between PEOU and BI were significant at the p < 0.05 level. The more tests performed on the same data set, the more likely it is that one will find significant results occurring by chance (what is called the problem of multiplicity [35]). To address this we have adjusted the α-values (the probability error rate, i.e.…”
Section: R 2 Values (In the Circles)
mentioning
confidence: 98%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The path between PEOU and BI were significant at the p < 0.05 level. The more tests performed on the same data set, the more likely it is that one will find significant results occurring by chance (what is called the problem of multiplicity [35]). To address this we have adjusted the α-values (the probability error rate, i.e.…”
Section: R 2 Values (In the Circles)
mentioning
confidence: 98%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The hypothesis was developed a priori and significance was taken at the 0.05 level, although we accept that overall inferences could be altered by applying a multiple testing procedure such as the Bonferroni adjustment or Holm's procedure. 33 Putative high-risk genotypes for increased susceptibility or poor outcome included GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null, and GSTM3 AA. High activity GSTP1 allelic variants are dependent on the substrate under study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%