1954
Deafness and Cleidocranial Dysostosis
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
12
1
0
0
Citation Types
0
2
1
0
Year Published
1955
2007
Publication Types
Select...
13
Relationship
0
13
Authors
Journals
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
References 0 publications
0
2
1
0
“…Previous studies regarding otolaryngological manifestations of CCD have been limited to case reports with particular bias toward EAC stenosis; these have been summarized in Table IV. 4–11 In the eight case reports just cited, 54% of patients had narrowed external auditory canals contributing to CHL, in contrast to the current study, with only one child with narrowed external auditory canals and normal hearing. Narrowed external auditory canals may not be as common as the previous case reports have suggested, because of selection bias toward publishing an interesting physical examination finding.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…Previous studies regarding otolaryngological manifestations of CCD have been limited to case reports with particular bias toward EAC stenosis; these have been summarized in Table IV. 4–11 In the eight case reports just cited, 54% of patients had narrowed external auditory canals contributing to CHL, in contrast to the current study, with only one child with narrowed external auditory canals and normal hearing. Narrowed external auditory canals may not be as common as the previous case reports have suggested, because of selection bias toward publishing an interesting physical examination finding.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…The phenotypic expression of CCD in the present study with most patients having hypoplasia or aplasia of the clavicle; multiple skull deformities, including frontal bossing and patent fontanels; and dental anomalies is similar to previous reports (Table IV). 4–11 The patients with CCD also had a significant number of problems of interest to otolaryngologists. Previous studies regarding otolaryngological manifestations of CCD have been limited to case reports with particular bias toward EAC stenosis; these have been summarized in Table IV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
