Deadtime correction for two multihead Anger cameras in dual‐energy‐window‐acquisition mode

Abstract

Two side-by-side energy windows, one at the photopeak and one at lower energy, are sometimes employed in quantitative SPECT studies. We measured the count-rate losses at moderately high activities of 131I for two multihead Anger cameras in such a dual-window-acquisition mode by imaging a decaying source composed of two hot spheres within a warm cylinder successively over a total of 23 days. The window locations were kept fixed and the paralyzable model was assumed. In addition, for the Picker Prism 3000 XP camera, the source was viewed from three different angles separated by 120 degrees and the final results are from an average over these three angles. For the Picker camera, the fits to the data from the individual windows are good (the mean of the squared correlation coefficient equals 0.98) while for the Siemens Multispect camera fits to the data from head 1 and from the lower-energy, monitor window are relatively poor. Therefore, with the Siemens camera the data from the two windows are combined for deadtime computation. Repeated autopeaking might improve the fits. At the maximum count rate, corresponding to a total activity of 740 MBq (20 mCi) in the phantom, the multiplicative deadtime correction factor is considerably larger for the Picker than for the Siemens camera. For the Picker camera, it is 1.11, 1.12, and 1.12 for heads 1-3 with the photopeak window and 1.10 for all heads with the lower-energy monitor window. For the Siemens camera, the combined-window deadtime correction factor is 1.02 for head 1 and 1.03 for head 2. Differences between the deadtime correction factor for focal activity and for the total activity do not support the hypothesis of count misplacement between foci of activity at these count rates. Therefore, the total-image dead time correction is recommended for any and all parts of the image.

Prediction of Therapy Tumor-Absorbed Dose Estimates in I-131 Radioimmunotherapy Using Tracer Data Via a Mixed-Model Fit to Time Activity

“…Deadtime correction by the decaying source method, which is based on the departure of the observed count rate from the known exponential decay of a source, has been described previously. 13 For the present SPECT/CT system, deadtime measurements with an I-131-filled phantom imaged on multiple days confirmed the validity of a paralyzable deadtime model. The measured deadtime constant was 2.5 ls, which was used to correct all post-therapy SPECT projection data before reconstruction.…”

MIRD Pamphlet No. 26: Joint EANM/MIRD Guidelines for Quantitative 177Lu SPECT Applied for Dosimetry of Radiopharmaceutical Therapy

“…It has been suggested (39) that the DT correction factor can be determined using a 5-to 10-min planar patient scan acquired in close connection to the tomographic acquisition. The DT correction factor can also be determined from multiple projection views (40).…”

Practical reconstruction protocol for quantitative 90Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT

“…[18][19][20] In this work, we used scaled images of the BC EW as a model to compensate for the background signal in the imaging EW. The BC EW was selected empirically from our phantom study and based on the errors in the activity recovery coefficient and the amount of residual background count in the cold lung insert.…”

“…31 Acrylic slabs of various thicknesses (2, 5, 9, 12, and 16 cm) were placed right below the phantom to introduce attenuation and scatter. For the 5 cmthick acrylic slab, the distance between the collimator and the phantom was varied to 15,20,25,30, and 35 cm. Planar static images were acquired for each imaging condition.…”