Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: a methodological study

Goossen, Käthe; Heß, Simone; Lunny, Carole; Pieper, Dawid

doi:10.1186/s12874-020-00983-3

Cited by 43 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 92 publications

(27 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fourth, our study underlines the need to complement database searching with backward and forward citation tracking to retrieve all studies in our final sample. Other studies have already shown the benefit of using citation tracking [7,29,45]; however, based on our study, it is not possible to draw conclusions about the benefit of further supplementary search methods recommended by current methodological guidance such as handsearching or consultation of experts [6]. This should be considered in future methodological research related to study retrieval in dementia care.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 76%

“…To guide researchers, medical librarians or information specialists in choosing relevant databases, health-related research provides evidence on (1) coverage and overlaps of specific databases or how database usage can be optimally combined for efficient search strategies [19][20][21][22][23], and on (2) optimized search approaches to retrieve specific study designs such as qualitative studies [15,24,25], trials [10,[26][27][28], reviews [29] or studies from specific countries [30,31]. Furthermore, there are clear guidelines on database use, e.g., for conducting Cochrane reviews [32].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Overlaps of multiple database retrieval and citation tracking in dementia care research: a methodological study

Hirt¹,

Bergmann²,

Karrer³

2021

jmla

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: We aimed to determine overlaps and optimal combination of multiple database retrieval and citation tracking for evidence synthesis, based on a previously conducted scoping review on facilitators and barriers to implementing nurse-led interventions in dementia care.Methods: In our 2019 scoping review, we performed a comprehensive literature search in eight databases (CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, MEDLINE, Ovid Nursing Database, PsycINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection) and used citation tracking. We retrospectively analyzed the coverage and overlap of 10,527 retrieved studies published between 2015 and 2019. To analyze database overlap, we used cross tables and multiple correspondence analysis (MCA).Results: Of the retrieved studies, 6,944 were duplicates and 3,583 were unique references. Using our search strategies, considerable overlaps can be found in some databases, such as between MEDLINE and Web of Science Core Collection or between CINAHL, Emcare, and PsycINFO. Searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection and using citation tracking were necessary to retrieve all included studies of our scoping review.Conclusions: Our results can contribute to enhancing future search practice related to database selection in dementia care research. However, due to limited generalizability, researchers and librarians should carefully choose databases based on the research question. More research on optimal database retrieval in dementia care research is required for the development of methodological standards.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 76%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Overlaps of multiple database retrieval and citation tracking in dementia care research: a methodological study

Hirt¹,

Bergmann²,

Karrer³

2021

jmla

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…MEDLINE via PubMed and Epistemonikos will be searched, complemented by reference checking of included studies, as this has been identified as the best database combination to identify systematic reviews of health-related topics. 37 Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar will also be searched as a minimum requirement to guarantee adequate and efficient coverage in systematic reviews. The COSMIN database and PsycINFO will be included as our review topic is related to the focus of these databases.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dental patient reported outcome and oral health-related quality of life measures: protocol for a systematic evidence map of reviews

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims This research synthesis protocol addresses the question: what is the evidence concerning measurement properties of dental patient reported outcome measures (dPROMs), and regarding the real-world value of dPROMs, and where are the gaps in this evidence? Evidence mapping will systematically examine reviews of quantitative dPROMs used to assess the impact of oral health on the quality of life of dental patients and research participants. Evidence gaps where future research or systematic reviews are required will be identified. Materials and methods This protocol accords with the PRISMA-P guideline. Open Science Framework Registration 10.17605/OSF.IO/RZD3N. Biomedical and grey literature databases will be searched, adapting the same search strategy. Published or unpublished reviews evaluating any dPROM will be considered for inclusion. There will be no restriction by date, setting, or language. AMSTAR2 and ROBIS will evaluate risk of bias. Psychometric criteria will be adapted from COSMIN. Data will be summarised separately for specific populations and conditions. Discussion The findings will enable clinicians and researchers to identify methodologically robust dPROMs, appropriate for use with relevant populations and conditions. Implications for real-world practice and research will be discussed.

show abstract

“…Metareview 8,9,24,29,33,34,41 Gathers systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and/or meta-syntheses and provides qualitative, semi-quantitative, or quantitative conclusions. Summarizes critically appraised, evaluated, and synthesized research questions(s) relating to study-level evidence using and documenting comprehensive, systematic search strategies, and rigorous, transparent appraisal methods.…”

Section: Type Of Review Definitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Best Practices for Meta-Reviews in Physical Activity and Health Research: Insights From the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Advisory Committee Scientific Report

Pescatello¹,

Hennessy²,

Katzmarzyk³

et al. 2021

Journal of Physical Activity and Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) have proliferated with a concomitant increase in reviews of SRs/MAs or “meta-reviews” (MRs). As uncovered by the 2018 US Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee (PAGAC), there is a paucity of best practice guidance on MRs on physical activity health-related research. This manuscript aims to fill this gap. Methods: In total, the PAGAC conducted 38 literature searches across 3 electronic databases and triaged 20,838 titles, 4913 abstracts, and 2139 full texts from which 1130 articles qualified for the PAGAC Scientific Report. Results: During the MR process, the following challenges were encountered: (1) if the SR/MA authors had limited experience in synthesis methodology, they likely did not account for risk of bias in the conclusions they reached; (2) many SRs/MAs reviewed the same primary-level studies; (3) many SRs/MAs failed to disclose effect modifier analyses; (4) source populations varied; (5) physical activity exposures were nonstandardized; and (6) dose–response effects or effect modification of the physical activity exposure could not be identified. Conclusions: Using examples from the PAGAC Scientific Report, we provide (1) a high-level introduction to MRs; (2) recommended steps in conducting a MR; (3) challenges that can be encountered; and (4) guidance in addressing these challenges.

show abstract

Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: a methodological study

Cited by 43 publications

References 92 publications

Overlaps of multiple database retrieval and citation tracking in dementia care research: a methodological study

Overlaps of multiple database retrieval and citation tracking in dementia care research: a methodological study

Dental patient reported outcome and oral health-related quality of life measures: protocol for a systematic evidence map of reviews

Best Practices for Meta-Reviews in Physical Activity and Health Research: Insights From the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Advisory Committee Scientific Report

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About