“…As a result, many life science databases in general and behavioral neuroscience databases in particular have grown out of a single research lab to mediate a particular tactical need. For example, neuroscience databases and data management tools include those seeking to manage transcriptional data (Shepherd et al, 1998), complex images such as fMRI scans (Marcus et al, 2007), laboratory information management systems (LIMS) and data management (Baker, Galloway, Jackson, Schmoyer, & Snoddy, 2004), formal collaborations and federated repositories (Gardner et al, 2008), publication data (Ruttenberg, Rees, Samwald, & Marshall, 2009), protein interaction (Colland et al, 2004; Shoemaker et al, 2012) and mass spec data (Horai et al, 2010), behavioral data (Maddatu, Grubb, Bult, & Bogue, 2012), electrophysiological measurements (Günay et al, 2009), and a series of disorder related repositories (Goodman et al, 2003; Matuszek & Talebizadeh, 2009). While not necessarily in conflict with the strategic goals of the greater behavioral neuroscience community, the ad hoc collection of boutique databases, analysis tools and information repositories that exist on the local level are often incompatible with comprehensive data mining.…”