2007
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889807030403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data reduction practice in X-ray reflectometry

Abstract: Data reduction practice in X-ray reflectometry is described. The several approaches for applying certain corrections, such as background subtraction, geometrical effects and normalization, are compared and discussed. Two widely employed setups, one with beam knife-edge and one without, are compared with respect to a number of corrections to be applied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated reflectivity which is compared with the measured reflectivity, after data reduction (see Salah et al, 2007), is then given by its squared modulus, r = jRj 2 . Whereas the algorithm gives the exact reflectivity for a stratified system, it is very cumbersome to apply in leastsquares algorithms because of its high non-linearity.…”
Section: Classical Gradient Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculated reflectivity which is compared with the measured reflectivity, after data reduction (see Salah et al, 2007), is then given by its squared modulus, r = jRj 2 . Whereas the algorithm gives the exact reflectivity for a stratified system, it is very cumbersome to apply in leastsquares algorithms because of its high non-linearity.…”
Section: Classical Gradient Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first sample, no Gaussian broadening was applied for instrumental resolution effects; in the second case, a resolution of 0.001 Å À1 was applied. although in a well defined experiment the noise can be kept constant and certainly lower than 25% by choosing variable step-counting times (Salah et al, 2007). The robustness of the algorithms was tested by varying either one of the parameters, while keeping the other parameters fixed at their model values, or by freeing all parameters at once.…”
Section: Program Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16,18] The necessary corrections to be applied to the observed reflectivity data have been described elsewhere. [19] A diagram of the experimental set-up is shown in Figure 2. The measurement cell, where the samples were hold, was manufactured in stainless steel with Mylar windows.…”
Section: X-ray Reflectometry Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The receiving slit in front of the monochromator was set at 0.1 mm. Data were collected using a variable counting time, variable step size strategy to optimize the total data collection time and the counting statistics (Salah et al, 2007). Data were collected up to 6-7 in 2.…”
Section: A11 National Institute For Materials Science Japanmentioning
confidence: 99%