2020
DOI: 10.1109/tcbb.2019.2912609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-Driven Robust Control for a Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proportional–integral–derivative (PID), fuzzy inference and model predictive control (MPC) are the most common approaches for AID systems, being the only ones with clinical validation so far [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. MPC has been extensively used [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ] and, when compared PID controllers, show better performance [ 10 , 11 ]. Nevertheless, Haidar [ 12 ] shows that fuzzy logic can still improve MPC performance and reduce the risk of hypoglycemia, which indicates the relevance of computational intelligence for the design of artificial pancreas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proportional–integral–derivative (PID), fuzzy inference and model predictive control (MPC) are the most common approaches for AID systems, being the only ones with clinical validation so far [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. MPC has been extensively used [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ] and, when compared PID controllers, show better performance [ 10 , 11 ]. Nevertheless, Haidar [ 12 ] shows that fuzzy logic can still improve MPC performance and reduce the risk of hypoglycemia, which indicates the relevance of computational intelligence for the design of artificial pancreas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UVa/Padova simulator allows the incorporation of different meal scenarios for the virtual patient (VP) population, allowing researchers to analyze the effectiveness of a control algorithm [16][17][18][19][20][21][22], validate optimization and adaptation strategies for insulin delivery [23][24][25][26], develop disturbance detection algorithms for meals [27][28][29] and exercise [30], develop methods for mitigating the risks of hypoglycemia [31,32], and integrate machine learning algorithms into conventional diabetes therapy and bolus calculator for the treatment of T1D patients [33][34][35]. In the literature, the meal scenarios used for testing BG regulation effectiveness are based on typical values considering three meals per day [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. However, in real life, the amount of carbohydrate intake and number of meals per day may vary patient to patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The population of people with diabetes reached 463 million in 2019 [1], and millions of them suffer from diabetes complications. Effective management can help to maintain the blood glucose (BG) levels of people with diabetes within a reasonable range and then prevent diabetes complications [2][3][4]. The continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device is an effective tool to continuously monitor BG levels of users [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%