2008
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v16i4.707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data confidentiality and data handling in research: a workshop report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 History SARMA was originally developed as an agentbased system where each patient was represented by a software agent, which performed data extraction and communication on behalf of patients being screened for trial participation.…”
Section: Box 1 Consent For Consentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 History SARMA was originally developed as an agentbased system where each patient was represented by a software agent, which performed data extraction and communication on behalf of patients being screened for trial participation.…”
Section: Box 1 Consent For Consentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 What these technologies should be was debated in appropriate depth in last year's journal. [5][6][7][8] Finally, Gibson-White and Majeed remind us of the importance of primary care records for research, and that this is a strength of the UK which we need to further develop. 9 …”
Section: Secondary Use Of Routinely Collected Data For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Routinely collected primary care data have been described as 'Goldmines for research', 17 yet many of us involved in research find it time consuming to get through the approval process.…”
Section: Consensus Statement On Using Routinely Collected Data For Rementioning
confidence: 99%