2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-021-03213-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data assimilation for turbulent mean flow and scalar fields with anisotropic formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of the method can be further improved by increasing the degree of freedom for optimization. He et al [69] use the adjoint-based data assimilation model to optimize an anisotropic Reynolds stress forcing and exceed the performance of He et al [68]. In conclusion, both of the data-driven methods discussed that were applied to jet flows [68,69] demonstrate superior performance in matching the reference velocity field compared to the RL model introduced in this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The performance of the method can be further improved by increasing the degree of freedom for optimization. He et al [69] use the adjoint-based data assimilation model to optimize an anisotropic Reynolds stress forcing and exceed the performance of He et al [68]. In conclusion, both of the data-driven methods discussed that were applied to jet flows [68,69] demonstrate superior performance in matching the reference velocity field compared to the RL model introduced in this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In conclusion, both of the data-driven methods discussed that were applied to jet flows [68,69] demonstrate superior performance in matching the reference velocity field compared to the RL model introduced in this work. However, it should be noted that they incorporate greater knowledge of the reference field [68] and have greater degrees of freedom [69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…An evaluation and validation of the current DA scheme is conducted using three test cases. As a result of the optimization of F, the average flow field and scalar field can be perfectly reproduced from the observations [106].…”
Section: Data Assimilationmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…2019; Chandramouli et al. 2020; He, Wang & Liu 2021). We focus on 4D-Var as the unsteady state is the current topic of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, variational DA can be implemented in either discrete or continuous form. The former implementation discretises the system before the derivation of the adjoint equation, which has a large memory requirement for expensive matrix computation (Papoutsis-Kiachagias & Giannakoglou 2016), and the latter implementation is thus preferred for complex flow configurations (Foures et al 2014;He et al 2018a;Li et al 2019;Chandramouli et al 2020;He, Wang & Liu 2021). We focus on 4D-Var as the unsteady state is the current topic of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%