2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2007.4379972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dart: A Fast Heuristic Algebraic Reconstruction Algorithm for Discrete Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many heuristic reconstruction have been developed over the years, which fall into two basic classes: methods that aim directly at solving the discrete optimization problem [3,4] and methods that solve (a series) of continuous optimization problems [5,6]. Even state-of-the-art iterative algorithms such as DART [6,7] are computationally very expensive as they are based on iterative reconstruction algorithms. Not only the costs of forward and backward projection and the memory usage scale linearly with N , the number of iterations required is also expected to scale linearly with N .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many heuristic reconstruction have been developed over the years, which fall into two basic classes: methods that aim directly at solving the discrete optimization problem [3,4] and methods that solve (a series) of continuous optimization problems [5,6]. Even state-of-the-art iterative algorithms such as DART [6,7] are computationally very expensive as they are based on iterative reconstruction algorithms. Not only the costs of forward and backward projection and the memory usage scale linearly with N , the number of iterations required is also expected to scale linearly with N .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some techniques introduce post-processing steps for the discretization of the result of a continuous reconstruction algorithm [13,14,15]. Other approaches introduce steering mechanisms into the process of continuous reconstruction methods to gain discrete results [11,12,19,32,48], or reformulate the problem as an energy minimization task, and approximate the solution with some stochastic [6,7,8,16,30,41,51,52,68], or deterministic [44,45,55,56,67,68] optimization strategy. Moreover, the difficulties described at the Continuous Reconstruction problem -i.e., the possible inconsistency of the projections, and the non-uniqueness of the results -can still be present in the discrete case, which makes an even bigger need for approximate solutions capable of handling inconsistent and incomplete projection data.…”
Section: Reconstruction Algorithms For Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case the iteration will stop in a semi-continuous solution, where some pixels are properly discretized, and the rest of them are left a) b) c) Figure 3.2: Some of the software phantoms used for testing. a) a binary image; b) a multivalued image from [11]; c) the well-known Shepp-Logan head phantom (see, e.g., page 53 of [39]). …”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations