2020
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/09/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dark matter constraints from dwarf galaxies with data-driven J-factors

Abstract: We present an updated analysis of the gamma-ray flux from the directions of classical dwarf spheroidal galaxies, deriving new constraints on WIMP dark matter (DM) annihilation using a decade of Fermi-LAT data. Among the major novelties, we infer the dwarfs' J-factors by including new observations without imposing any a priori parametric profile for the DM distribution. While statistically compatible with results obtained from more conventional parameterisations, this procedure reduces the theoretical bias impo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for shifting away from the 'non-parametric' dark matter mass profile from Read & Steger (2017) is twofold. Firstly, for ∼1000+ tracers, the results from using the NFW profile and the 'non-parametric' profile agree within their respective 68% confidence intervals Alvarez et al (2020), yet the NFW model fit parameters are more cosmologically useful (Read et al 2018;Read & Erkal 2019). Secondly, in the absence of data, the default priors on the non-parametric mass profile favour a high density in the centre that falls very steeply outwards, inconsistent with expectations in most popular cosmological models.…”
Section: Mass Modelling With G Smentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The reasons for shifting away from the 'non-parametric' dark matter mass profile from Read & Steger (2017) is twofold. Firstly, for ∼1000+ tracers, the results from using the NFW profile and the 'non-parametric' profile agree within their respective 68% confidence intervals Alvarez et al (2020), yet the NFW model fit parameters are more cosmologically useful (Read et al 2018;Read & Erkal 2019). Secondly, in the absence of data, the default priors on the non-parametric mass profile favour a high density in the centre that falls very steeply outwards, inconsistent with expectations in most popular cosmological models.…”
Section: Mass Modelling With G Smentioning
confidence: 83%
“…McConnachie 2012; Alvarez et al (2020). We expect that the galaxies with the most cusp-like profiles will have the largest dark matter phase-space densities and are therefore the objects of most significance to the bound presented in this work.…”
Section: Higher Moments Of the Velocity Dispersionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The red contour is the 95% CL contour of the fit to the Galactic Center excess reported in [76] for the same annihilation channel. We also display bounds from different samples dwarf spheroidal galaxies (dSph) derived with a new data-driven method [77] (green solid line), with traditional template-fitting strategies [78] (green dashed line), and by combining Fermi-LAT and ground-based telescopes data [79] (Glory Duck project, green dot-dashed line). The yellow band are radio constraints derived from the EMU survey [80].…”
Section: Bounds On Dmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or less aggressive assumptions entering its derivation. We illustrate that by plotting: i) A rather conservative bound, obtained by limiting the study to four classical, kinematically well-determined dSph, and using a data-driven approach for both DM profiles and astrophysical background determination (solid green curve, from [77]; see also [84] for methodological details). ii) The bound published by the Fermi-LAT Collaboration [78], and performed with traditional template-fitting techniques of the data in a rather large region of interest around the target.…”
Section: (Dotted Black Line)mentioning
confidence: 99%