1985
DOI: 10.2307/4091137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dallas: A Case Study in Skyway Economics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) a liking for indoor pedestrian environments; and (3) familiarity with the underground network (Corbett 2009;Dillon 1985;Robertson 1993aRobertson , 1993bWang and Liang 2010). However, these reasons were seldom nominated by the respondents in Shanghai's UPS.…”
Section: Transportation Modes and Durationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) a liking for indoor pedestrian environments; and (3) familiarity with the underground network (Corbett 2009;Dillon 1985;Robertson 1993aRobertson , 1993bWang and Liang 2010). However, these reasons were seldom nominated by the respondents in Shanghai's UPS.…”
Section: Transportation Modes and Durationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Dallas, because the city lacked sufficient population density in its downtown to support activity both above and below ground levels, the highly functional UPS system channelled people underground, leaving the primary activity at street level to be vehicular travel (Terranova, 2009). A similar argument about the relationship between population density and development on multiple levels was also proposed by Dillon (1985), who argued that with regard to the issue of the negative impact of a GSPS on street life, it was largely dependent on the city. Dillon used the IDS Center in Minneapolis as an example of how a pedestrian flow of 4000 people per hour can easily support active development on two levels.…”
Section: Negative Impacts Of Grade Separation Pedestrian Systems On Smentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There are varied reasons for the development, implementation and growth of GSPS. The influence of transport considerations was highlighted in previous research into the evolvement of GSPS, including minimising car-pedestrian conflicts, decreasing traffic congestion, facilitating walking, reducing car transport, enhancing public transport and integrating with subway transport (Bhalla and Pant, 1985;Dillon, 1985;Robertson, 1987a, b;Boisvert, 2007;Wang and Liang, 2010;Cui et al, 2013a, b). Meanwhile, also mentioned in the literature are other drivers of the urban environment and the development rationale of GSPS, namely, climate, economy and social considerations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…UPS strategy obtained great success in a number of cities by satisfying varied needs in different urban settings such as Montreal and Toronto with their cold winters and Hong Kong and Tokyo with their high ur-ban densities. The initial rationale in developing grade separation pedestrian systems was identified as providing protection for pedestrians in central urban locations from severe weather conditions (Belanger 2007;Robertson 1993aRobertson , 1993bTerranova 2009;Warkentin, Vachon 2009), easing traffic congestion related to vehicle-pedestrian conflicts and improving pedestrian accessibility and safety (Bhalla, Pant 1985;Corbett et al 2009;Dillon 1985;Wang, Liang 2010), and promoting transit, particularly in subway metros (Boisvert 2007;Dillon 1985;Robertson 1987b). After decades of development, the potential of grade separation pedestrian systems in stimulating economic development has become the dominant reason for investing in UPS.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 99%