DaLiF: a data lifecycle framework for data-driven governments

Abstract

The public sector, private firms, business community, and civil society are generating data that is high in volume, veracity, velocity and comes from a diversity of sources. This kind of data is known as big data. Public Administrations (PAs) pursue big data as “new oil” and implement data-centric policies to transform data into knowledge, to promote good governance, transparency, innovative digital services, and citizens’ engagement in public policy. From the above, the Government Big Data Ecosystem (GBDE) emerges. Managing big data throughout its lifecycle becomes a challenging task for governmental organizations. Despite the vast interest in this ecosystem, appropriate big data management is still a challenge. This study intends to fill the above-mentioned gap by proposing a data lifecycle framework for data-driven governments. Through a Systematic Literature Review, we identified and analysed 76 data lifecycles models to propose a data lifecycle framework for data-driven governments (DaliF). In this way, we contribute to the ongoing discussion around big data management, which attracts researchers’ and practitioners’ interest.

Znanstveno-raziskovalni izzivi na poti digitalne preobrazbe

“…Podatkovne zrelosti tako ne moremo oceniti le z upoštevanjem enega kriterija ali dejavnika, ampak skozi prizmo več posameznih, zato jo moramo obravnavati kot večkriterijski problem. Zelo pomemben je življenjski cikel upravljanja podatkov (Badia, 2020;Shah et al, 2021), ki predstavlja osnovo podatkovne zrelosti in vključuje zajem podatkov, njihovo hrambo, analizo, uporabo, deljenje, arhiviranje in uničenje.…”

“…Kot pomembna dejavnika sta poleg že omenjenih revizija in poročanje (Cosic et al, 2012;Marchildon et al, 2018) ter ustvarjanje vrednosti s podatki (Gandhi et al, 2018;Hanafizadeh & Harati Nik, 2020). Ob tem mora organizacija upoštevati življenjski cikel podatkov (Badia, 2020;Shah et al, 2021).…”

“…Zaradi stalnega naraščanja podatkov postaja upravljanje le-teh vedno bolj zapleteno (El Arass & Souissi, 2018). Za učinkovito upravljanje podatkov predstavlja pomemben del življenjski cikel podatkov, ki opredeljuje obstoj podatka in posamezne faze, skozi katere gre vsak podatek tekom njegovega obstoja (zbiranje, shranjevanje, čiščenje podatkov, priprava in analiza, arhiviranje in uničenje podatkov) (Shah et al, 2021). Prva faza zajema zbiranje podatkov, kjer podjetje najprej zbere podatke iz različnih podatkovnih virov (informacijski sistemi podjetja, družbeni mediji, repozitoriji odprtih podatkov, senzorji naprav) ali pa jih podjetje ustvari tekom poslovanja (Baesens et al, 2016).…”

Internet stvari in kiberfizični sistemi – prototipna zasnova

“…zbiranje, hramba, čiščenje podatkov, priprava in analiza, arhiviranje in uničenje podatkov). (Spruit & Pietzka, 2015a); (Mouhib et al, 2020); (Badia, 2020); (Shah et al, 2021);…”

Application of Open Government Data to Sustainable City Indicators: A Megacity Case Study

“…The final sample of 51 documents comprises 10 documents related to the topic of standards ("ISO 37120" or "ISO 37122" or "ISO 37123"), 34 related to "open government data", 1 related to "city benchmarking", and 6 related to "data driven government". All the documents found in this search were related to only one of four topics, except four papers, which were related to both "open government data" and "data driven government" [75][76][77][78]. Most papers (34 documents, 67%) were related to "open government data", which can be explained by the fact that the other three topics are very recent in the selected period (2017-2021), in comparison to that topic.…”