Purpose/Objective(s)-The purpose of this study was to assess variability in contouring the gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) of three clinical cervix cancer cases Address for Correspondence: Anthony Fyles, MD, FRCPC, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9, Phone: 416-946-6522, Fax: 416-946-2111, ; Email: Anthony.Fyles@rmp.uhn.on.ca Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. by a cohort of international experts in the field, in preparation for the development of an online teaching atlas.
Conflicts of Interest: none
HHS Public AccessMethods and Materials-Twelve international experts participated. Three clinical scenarios: node positivity (PLN), retroverted uterus (RV) and parametrial invasion (PI) were used. Sagittal and axial MR images of the clinical cases were downloaded to participants' treatment planning systems for contouring. The GTV/cervix/uterus/parametria/vagina and nodal CTV were contoured. Contours' consensus was assessed for sensitivity/specificity using an expectation maximization algorithm called Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) and overall experts' agreement was summarized by kappa statistics.Results-Agreement for GTV in the three clinical cases was high (STAPLE sensitivity 0.54-0.92; specificity 0.97-0.98; kappa measure for PLN, RV and PI was 0.86, 0.76 and 0.42; p<0.0001).Moderate to substantial agreement was seen for nodal CTV (kappa statistics for PLN, RV and PI was 0.65, 0.58 and 0.62; p<0.0001), uterus (kappa for PLN, RV and PI was 0.45, 0.74 and 0.77; p<0.0001) and parametria (kappa for PLN, RV and PI was 0.49, 0.62 and 0.50; p<0.0001).Contouring heterogeneity was greatest for the cervix (kappa measure for PLN, RV and PI was 0.15, 0.4 and 0.24; p<0.0001) and vagina (kappa for PLN, RV and PI was 0.47, 0.36 and 0.46; <0.0001), reflecting difficulties in determining the interface between GTV and these tissues.Conclusion-Kappa statistics of the different CTV components generally demonstrated moderate to substantial agreement among international experts in the field of gynecological radiotherapy. Further planning target volume (PTV) margins accounting for organ motion and setup errors are a necessary addition to the CTV.