2012 IEEE International Conference on Complex Systems (ICCS) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icocs.2012.6458559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

D2V-VNS-RPS: Delay and delay variation constrained algorithm based on Variable Neighborhood Search algorithm for RP Selection problem in PIM-SM protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These parameters must be optimized from all sources to each multicast member. Unlike the first work (D2V-VNS-RPS [38]) we introduce in this work the MODE and fitness functions: MODE function [36] is used to know the location of core and a fitness function to measure the potential cost, delay and delay variation, this function is an enhanced version of the CMP function [36], [37]. The MODE function is presented in formula ( 9) and can take 5 values: I) if the candidate core is one source, II) if one destination node exist in the path between the candidate core and one source, III) if one source exist in the path between the candidate core and one destination node, IV) if II and III, and V) otherwise, where U !…”
Section: Fitness Functionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These parameters must be optimized from all sources to each multicast member. Unlike the first work (D2V-VNS-RPS [38]) we introduce in this work the MODE and fitness functions: MODE function [36] is used to know the location of core and a fitness function to measure the potential cost, delay and delay variation, this function is an enhanced version of the CMP function [36], [37]. The MODE function is presented in formula ( 9) and can take 5 values: I) if the candidate core is one source, II) if one destination node exist in the path between the candidate core and one source, III) if one source exist in the path between the candidate core and one destination node, IV) if II and III, and V) otherwise, where U !…”
Section: Fitness Functionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…To demonstrate the performance of this algorithm (QoS-VNS-CS), we compare it with the following algorithms, including, Tabu RP selection (TRPS) [37], DDVCA [6], AKC [36] and D2V-VNS-RPS [38]. The main objective of our algorithm is to reduce delay and delay variation; therefore, we start the simulation results by comparing these two metrics.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To reduce multicast cost and end-to-end delay, VNS-RP is proposed based on VNS heuristic algorithm [6]. D2V-VNS-RPS algorithm is proposed based on VNS heuristic algorithm, which selects the RP router by considering tree cost, delay, and delay variation [31]. A static core selection approach that uses distance vector routing (DVR) as the unicast routing protocol is presented [32].…”
Section: Related Work 21 Ip Multicastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the mapping of MSEID2 was not stored in NRS, NRS returned the Enable-state candidate core NA2 (arrow 28) and added the mapping of MSEID2 and NA2. After receiver3 joined the multicast service MSEID2, Router2 forwarded the multicast packets to receiver3 based on MSEID2 (arrows [29][30][31]. Compared with PIM-SM, ILDM could effectively avoid core overload by using NRS to dynamically allocate a low-load core to each multicast service.…”
Section: Comparison Of Ildm and Pim-smmentioning
confidence: 99%