2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytochrome b sequence analysis reveals differential molecular evolution in African mole-rats of the chromosomally hyperdiverse genus Fukomys (Bathyergidae, Rodentia) from the Zambezian region

Abstract: African mole-rats (Bathyergidae, Rodentia) of the (eu)social genus Fukomys are one of the most speciose mammal genera endemic to Sub-Saharan Africa. Fukomys distributed in the Zambezian phytochorion is characterized by extreme chromosomal variation (2n = 40-78). We inferred a molecular phylogeny of Zambezian Fukomys to resolve the interrelationships and the evolutionary history of the known chromosomal races. We sequenced the entire cytochrome b gene (1140 bp) for a total of 66 specimens representing 18 karyot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
76
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The coding of adjacent syntenies with no mention of centromeres (strategy (i) in Material and Methods) or the coding of adjacent syntenies and centromere positions in two different characters (strategy (ii) in Material and Methods) both resulted in a single tree that failed to retrieve Fukomys monophyly (not shown). This is in marked contrast to the strong support for this clade by DNA sequences (Faulkes et al 2004, Ingram et al 2004, Van Daele et al 2007b. Moreover, we note that strategy (ii) tends to introduce over-weighting of characters since where a centromere position disrupts an adjacent synteny it is coded 1 and the synteny is also coded 1 (i.e., the centromere cannot be present without the adjacent synteny being present as well).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The coding of adjacent syntenies with no mention of centromeres (strategy (i) in Material and Methods) or the coding of adjacent syntenies and centromere positions in two different characters (strategy (ii) in Material and Methods) both resulted in a single tree that failed to retrieve Fukomys monophyly (not shown). This is in marked contrast to the strong support for this clade by DNA sequences (Faulkes et al 2004, Ingram et al 2004, Van Daele et al 2007b. Moreover, we note that strategy (ii) tends to introduce over-weighting of characters since where a centromere position disrupts an adjacent synteny it is coded 1 and the synteny is also coded 1 (i.e., the centromere cannot be present without the adjacent synteny being present as well).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Preliminary data obtained from a geometric morphometrical analysis of the ventral side of the cranium of a number of closely related chromosomal races belonging to the F. micklemi phylogroup suggest that during raciation small localized shape changes (shape changes of so-called non-uniform origin; Zelditch et al 2004) could modify the integration of structures with shifts in functionality. As expected, these shape changes do not seem to follow the cladogenetic sequence of events as depicted by a cyt b phylogeny (Van Daele et al 2006). This fact could be further exploited to understand how either plastic responses to immediate ecological conditions (cf.…”
Section: Prospects (For Phylogenetic Studies and Beyond)mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…(b-d) Represent alternative hypotheses for convergent gains and losses in solitarity/sociality, dependent on the status of the common ancestor of the family: (b) with a solitary common ancestor, sociality arises independently twice in Heterocephalus and the common ancestor of Fukomys/Cryptomys, with further elaboration to eusociality in extant H. glaber and F. damarensis; with a social common ancestor, either sociality is lost in the common ancestor of Heliophobius and descendent lineages to re-emerge in Fukomys/Cryptomys (c), or retained in common ancestors with loss and the evolution of a solitary lifestyle in lineages leading to Heliophobius, Bathyergus and Georychus (d ). Other, less parsimonious explanations are also possible (data adapted from earlier studies [3][4][5][6][7][8]). …”
Section: Background: Phylogeography and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%