1997
DOI: 10.1677/erc.0.0040357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclin-dependent kinases as downstream targets of oestrogen action: potential prognostic indicators and therapeutic targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cyclin D1 interacts both physically and functionally with ER, leading to upregulation of ER-mediated transcription [25]. A strong association between cyclin D1 and ER mRNA levels has been found, suggesting a functional relationship between the expressions of these genes [35]. Other studies have shown that high cyclin D1 levels are associated with ER positivity and/or well-differentiated carcinomas, both features known to be associated with a good prognosis [12,37], consistent with our finding of an association between cyclin D1 expression and ER· expression, which was mainly detected in well-differentiated tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Cyclin D1 interacts both physically and functionally with ER, leading to upregulation of ER-mediated transcription [25]. A strong association between cyclin D1 and ER mRNA levels has been found, suggesting a functional relationship between the expressions of these genes [35]. Other studies have shown that high cyclin D1 levels are associated with ER positivity and/or well-differentiated carcinomas, both features known to be associated with a good prognosis [12,37], consistent with our finding of an association between cyclin D1 expression and ER· expression, which was mainly detected in well-differentiated tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…CCND1 expression status might also be a useful marker to predict the response to endocrine therapy (Gillett et al, 1996;Sutherland et al, 1997;Wilcken et al, 1997;Barnes and Gillett, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%