2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12204-008-0291-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Customer requirements mapping method based on association rule mining for mass customization

Abstract: Customer requirements analysis is the key step for product variety design of mass customization(MC). Quality function deployment (QFD) is a widely used management technique for understanding the voice of the customer (VOC), however, QFD depends heavily on human subject judgment during extracting customer requirements and determination of the importance weights of customer requirements. QFD process and related problems are so complicated that it is not easily used. In this paper, based on a general data structu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Get the weighting from (8). Calculate the product technical performance weighting CT = ωi based on single-sort hierarchy.…”
Section: Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fahp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Get the weighting from (8). Calculate the product technical performance weighting CT = ωi based on single-sort hierarchy.…”
Section: Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fahp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Section 2.4, assume the matrix to be a fuzzy consistent judgment matrix, get the weighting from (8), and calculate the final product technical performance weighting. We can see that the term of titanium lump generation (T4 = 0.18402) in product quality (N2) is the focal point of the customer.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The similarity of different structure elements is seldom studied (the non-isomorphism generalized modules may have the same feature in function, process, interface, variation regularity of scale, and so on). The researches on product data mining method are not very sufficient enough, [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] such as the relative independence of the mining algorithm, the lack of integral mining system for all aspects of mass customization, and the neglect of the standardization of mining results. Due to the lack of more effective theories and methods, lots of resource and knowledge in product data are difficult to express, mine, and discovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 674 Z. Zhang et al studies of Jiao and Zhang (2005), Shao et al (2006) and Xia and Wang (2010), a simple Apriori-based algorithm was used to mine the association rules between CRs and product specifications, product specifications and configuration alternatives, and CRs and the items of product family architecture, respectively. Two indices (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%