2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2020.115891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current and near-future technologies for antibiotic susceptibility testing and resistant bacteria detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only cell lysates and tissue samples have similar complexity, and their analysis still lasts long. The reason is a longer time that is necessary for sample preparation, and the detection of residual antibiotics [224] in food is much less complex task than the detection of antibiotic‐resistant food pathogens [230]. Now, we are coming to the point where the detection with fast and reliable biosensors is not the problem [231], where the real bottleneck is on‐line sample preparation.…”
Section: New Trends In Detection Of Foodborne Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only cell lysates and tissue samples have similar complexity, and their analysis still lasts long. The reason is a longer time that is necessary for sample preparation, and the detection of residual antibiotics [224] in food is much less complex task than the detection of antibiotic‐resistant food pathogens [230]. Now, we are coming to the point where the detection with fast and reliable biosensors is not the problem [231], where the real bottleneck is on‐line sample preparation.…”
Section: New Trends In Detection Of Foodborne Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross‐reaction among the different tested pathogens was also not observed. An analysis of current and near‐future technologies for detection of bacteria [230] has the following result: presently, the shortest time necessary for sample preparation and the detection of pathogen bacteria is minimally about 2 h long (and more, see Ref. [235]); near future based technologies like Raman spectrometry [236] or microfluidic technologies [237] are also time consuming, again for the reason of sample pretreatment.…”
Section: New Trends In Detection Of Foodborne Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unexpectedly, they became even a bigger problem due to the changes in today's modern lifestyle and socioeconomical activities, which accelerates the spread of infection much faster around the world [ 2 ]. Due to this, many advances in detection and treatment of infectious disease have been studied and reported in the past decades, including developing different types of vaccines, innovative technologies, e.g., single-cell based studies, CRISPR technologies, RNA interference that help us to explore infectious disease more [ [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] ]. Moreover, CAR- and TCR-T cell-based therapies have been also investigated as new candidates [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such diagnostic technologies are crucial for reducing empirical treatments for infectious diseases with broad-spectrum antibiotics, promoting evidence-based antibiotic prescriptions, enacting antibiotic stewardship, and facilitating resistance surveillance, thereby safeguarding existing antibiotics and minimizing the emergence of new multi-drug resistant microorganisms. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] To this end, significant advances in molecular diagnostics have created rapid identification technologies that are becoming turnkey in clinical microbiology. AST technologies, on the other hand, currently remain reliant on time-consuming culturing and thus still require about 48 h after sample collection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%