2013
Current and Evolving Knowledge of Prognostic Factors for Pediatric Ependymomas
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
13
3
3
2
Citation Types
1
9
0
5
Year Published
Range
2000
2026
Publication Types
Select...
11
6
2
1
Relationship
4
16
Authors
Journals
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
References 50 publications
1
9
0
5
Optimizing biomarkers for accurate ependymoma diagnosis, prognostication, and stratification within International Clinical Trials: A BIOMECA study
Neuro-Oncology
Self Cite
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, concordant observation was only reported in 8.2% (11/134; 3 PFA, 2 PFB, 6 ST-ZFTA; Figure 2 ). As similarly reported by Andreiuolo et al, 27 a significant number of cases, 26% (35/134, France) and 12.7% (17/134, United Kingdom) showed technical failure. The center in France determined 16.4% (22/134) UK cases to have failed compared to just 5.2% (7/134) UK cases determined to have failed in the UK center.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 80%