2016
DOI: 10.15365/joce.2001022016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culturally Responsive Peace Education: A Case Study at One Urban Latino K-8 Catholic School

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with Dallavis's (2011Dallavis's ( , 2014 findings, Buck (2016), Woodrow (2018), and Bradley-Levine and each studied single urban Catholic schools or programs in schools that intentionally enacted CST-aligned pedagogy, yet found that these schools and programs succeeded largely in part due to specific organizational support for these practices. Consistent with Scanlan's (2008) findings, Aldana (2015 and Fuller and Johnson (2014) in their case studies of urban Catholic high schools found that inequitable and exclusionary pedagogical practices became harder to subvert when certain organizational demands took precedence over enacting mission-aligned practice.…”
Section: Enactment Of An Organizational Identity Rooted In Catholic Social Teachingmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with Dallavis's (2011Dallavis's ( , 2014 findings, Buck (2016), Woodrow (2018), and Bradley-Levine and each studied single urban Catholic schools or programs in schools that intentionally enacted CST-aligned pedagogy, yet found that these schools and programs succeeded largely in part due to specific organizational support for these practices. Consistent with Scanlan's (2008) findings, Aldana (2015 and Fuller and Johnson (2014) in their case studies of urban Catholic high schools found that inequitable and exclusionary pedagogical practices became harder to subvert when certain organizational demands took precedence over enacting mission-aligned practice.…”
Section: Enactment Of An Organizational Identity Rooted In Catholic Social Teachingmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Though this understanding of social justice has evolved over time and has always been contested within the Catholic community, the general precepts of CST as articulated by leaders within the institutional Church have helped Catholic school educators connect their professional practice to a communal organizational identity (Miller, 2007). Several of the reviewed studies in this cluster assessed the ways Catholic educators have made sense of this CST-informed identity and evaluated the limits of the enactment of CST in their practice serving low-income students, students of color, and other students from historically marginalized communities (Aldana, 2015;Bradley-Levine & Carr, 2015;Buck, 2016;Dallavis, 2011Dallavis, , 2014Fuller & Johnson, 2014;Scanlan, 2008;Woodrow, 2018).…”
Section: Enactment Of An Organizational Identity Rooted In Catholic Social Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflict resolution can serve as a springboard in enhancing underserved communities’ capacity for peacebuilding, which, when sustained longer term, can have an impact at the structural and cultural levels. Some studies suggest that effective and culturally responsive peace education strategies train those from within the community to be “peace educators” and resolve conflicts using nonviolence approaches (Buck, 2017; Cann, 2012; Morrison et al, 2011). To this end, Brantmeier (2007) called for community-based collaborations to be more commonplace components of peace education, which supports the framing of participatory learning as part of a transformative model (Turay & English, 2008).…”
Section: Constructing Peacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…People around the world experience and encounter different types of violence and conflicts stemming from several reasons. Gender (Borg & Grech 2014;Manojlovic 2018 andSnauwaert, 2019), religion (Billings Chilcoat 2017;Borg &Grech, 2014 andManojlovic 2018), ethnicity or racism (Billings Chilcoat, 2017;Borg & Grech, 2014;Buck, 2016;Costa & Ivenicki, 2016;Harris, 2004;Manojlovic, 2018;Ooko, Muthomi, & Odhiambo, 2015;Ubogu, 2016 andVerma, 2017), color (Manojlovic, 2018), language (Manojlovic, 2018), oppression (Verma, 2017), militarism (Snauwaert, 2019), terrorism (Agnihotri, 2017), extremism (Manojlovic, 2018), stereotypes (Agnihotri, 2017;Costa & Ivenicki, 2016), prejudices (Agnihotri, 2017 andCosta &Ivenicki, 2016) and sexuality (Borg &Grech, 2014 andHarris, 2004) may lead to violence and conflicts among people. Such violence and conflicts may create asymmetrical power relations in society (Bajaj, 2015 andBorg &Grech, 2014), social and economical disparities and inequalities (Agnihotri, 2017 andBajaj, 2015), genocide (Harris, 2004), marginalized or disadvantaged groups (Bajaj, 2015 andVerma, 2017) and ecocide…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%