2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.12.019
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

CSF cutoffs for MCI due to AD depend on APOEε4 carrier status

Abstract:  CSF Aβ42/P-tau ratio distribution revealed the presence of 3 subgroups;  APOEε4 status influenced CSF Aβ42/P-tau ratio cutoff extraction and Alzheimer's progression;  Higher diagnostic accuracy of APOE-specific classification compared to single cutoffs ;  Results were replicated in an independent cohort.

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
12
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
1
0

Year Published

Range
2020
2020
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
15
1

Relationship

5
11

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 16 publications

(15 citation statements)
references

References 54 publications

0
14
1
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In that investigation, the cut-off of "positivity" to that CSF A␤ 42 /p-tau biomarker was 15.2 for APOE4 carriers and 8.9 for APOE4 non-carriers [47]. In the present study, all ADMCI patients with APOE4 status had the CSF A␤ 42 /p-tau lower than 15.2, whereas the ADMCI patients without APOE4 status had the CSF A␤ 42 /p-tau lower than 8.9.…”
contrasting
confidence: 38%
“…A sigmoidal standard curve was plotted to allow the quantitative expression (pg mL –1 ) of measured light absorbance. All ADMCI patients of the present study were “positive” to the CSF Aβ 42 /p-tau biomarker with a threshold defined in a previous investigation of our Workgroup [47]. In that investigation, the cut-off of “positivity” to that CSF Aβ 42 /p-tau biomarker was 15.2 for APOE4 carriers and 8.9 for APOE4 non-carriers [47].…”
Section: Methods
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation