“…Two (1)-C(2) 1.370 (3) C17HITN304 AND Clgn2oN206 constraining the orientation of the phenyl ring to lie close to the N(1)-C(4) vertical symmetry plane of the 1,4-DHP ring (Loev et al, 1974;Rodenkirchen, Bayer, Steiner, Bossert, Meyer &Moller, 1979). Diffraction studies (Triggle, Shefter & Triggle, 1980;Fossheim, Swarteng, Mostad, Romming, Shefter & Triggle, 1982) confirmed this intramolecular constraint and furthermore revealed that antagonist potency correlated more strongly with the degree of DHP ring flatness than with the degree of phenyl ring rotational coplanarity with the N(1)-C(4) DHP vertical symmetry plane. In such structures the DHP ring has a shallow boat conformation with N(1) and C(4) defining the stern and bow positions, the aryl group is situated above the bow of the boat in an axial or flagpole orientation with the ortho or meta substituent almost invariably positioned on the forward or bowsprit side of the phenyl ring.…”