“…The best-fitted parameters of 1 were J = −290 cm −1 , g = 2.03, and x
PI = 5.2% (Table 1, Figure 5). The resulting J value for 1 is comparable to those [ J = (−285)–(−329) cm −1 ] reported for the Cu(II) dimers with four NCN bridges, for which the X-ray structures have been determined, for example, [Cu 2 ( μ -AzabH) 4 Cl 2 ]Cl 2 ·3CH 3 OH [21], [Cu 2 ( μ -AdeH) 4 Cl 2 ]Cl 2 ·6H 2 O [22, 23], [Cu 2 ( μ -AdeH) 4 (H 2 O) 2 ](ClO 4 ) 4 ·2H 2 O [23, 24], and [Cu 2 ( μ -4ClLH x ) 4 (ClO 4 ) 2 ](ClO 4 ) 2 ·2EtOH·H 2 O [8]; AzabH = 4-azabenzimidazole, AdeH = adenine, 4ClLH x = N6-(4-chlorobenzyl)adenine. The experimental data of 2 were fitted with J = −162 cm −1 , g = 2.05, and x
PI = 0.7% (Table 1, Figure 5), which means that the antiferromagnetic exchange for 2 was found to be substantially smaller than that for 1 .…”