2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-016-3513-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossover assessment of cardiolocomotor synchronization during running

Abstract: Synchrogram and iCP tools currently employed for measuring CLC are not appropriate because they indicate the occurrence of this phenomenon even among subjects who ran on different days and times of each other.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To force entrainment, a participant can be guided to run at a rate close to their heart rate. To this end, previous studies have used either a fixed cadence for all participants [10] or adaptivepaced metronome determined by instantaneous heart rate [11] to guide step rate and instigate 1:1 phase-locking. However, the former does not provide the bespoke rate required for an individual to perform "naturally", and the latter does not fix the rate of one oscillatorit would be difficult to quantify entrainment, as both signals fluctuate instantaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To force entrainment, a participant can be guided to run at a rate close to their heart rate. To this end, previous studies have used either a fixed cadence for all participants [10] or adaptivepaced metronome determined by instantaneous heart rate [11] to guide step rate and instigate 1:1 phase-locking. However, the former does not provide the bespoke rate required for an individual to perform "naturally", and the latter does not fix the rate of one oscillatorit would be difficult to quantify entrainment, as both signals fluctuate instantaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the former does not provide the bespoke rate required for an individual to perform "naturally", and the latter does not fix the rate of one oscillatorit would be difficult to quantify entrainment, as both signals fluctuate instantaneously. These methods [10,11] produce artificial conditions rather than measuring natural running style. Again, CLS may be mechanical or neurological in origin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%