2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2015.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-sectional analysis of long bones in a sample of ancient Egyptians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a wide variety of factors can affect long bone diaphyseal morphology (Pearson and Lieberman, 2004;Ruff et al, 2006a), mechanical loading, associated with different weightbearing activities, is a key influence on the relative strength, and hence, the diaphyseal area, of lower limb bones (Shaw and Stock, 2009;Rantalainen et al, 2010;Ruff and Larsen, 2014). Anthropologists have, therefore, used diaphyseal morphology as a basis to explore the activities, environment, and possible social organization of past populations Takahashi, 1982, 1984; Stock and Pheiffer, 2001;Holt, 2003;Stock and Pfeiffer, 2004;Ruff et al, 1984;Ruff et al, 2006b;Marchi et al, 2006;Charlson et al, 2007;Maggiano et al, 2008;Marchi, 2008;Sparacello et al, 2008;Stock et al, 2011;Larsen and Ruff, 2011;Trinkaus and Ruff, 2012;Shaw and Stock, 2013;Zaki et al, 2015; Stock and Macintosh, in press). As examples, the crosssectional shape and robusticity of the diaphysis of lower limb bones have been used to explain higher lower limb loading activities in populations of hunter-gatherers, compared to agriculture or industrial populations, as well as to elucidate possible division of labor among males and females within and across different populations (Ruff, 1987;Bridge, 1989;Nakatsukasa, 1990;Wescott, 2006;Marchi, 2008;Ruff and Larsen, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although a wide variety of factors can affect long bone diaphyseal morphology (Pearson and Lieberman, 2004;Ruff et al, 2006a), mechanical loading, associated with different weightbearing activities, is a key influence on the relative strength, and hence, the diaphyseal area, of lower limb bones (Shaw and Stock, 2009;Rantalainen et al, 2010;Ruff and Larsen, 2014). Anthropologists have, therefore, used diaphyseal morphology as a basis to explore the activities, environment, and possible social organization of past populations Takahashi, 1982, 1984; Stock and Pheiffer, 2001;Holt, 2003;Stock and Pfeiffer, 2004;Ruff et al, 1984;Ruff et al, 2006b;Marchi et al, 2006;Charlson et al, 2007;Maggiano et al, 2008;Marchi, 2008;Sparacello et al, 2008;Stock et al, 2011;Larsen and Ruff, 2011;Trinkaus and Ruff, 2012;Shaw and Stock, 2013;Zaki et al, 2015; Stock and Macintosh, in press). As examples, the crosssectional shape and robusticity of the diaphysis of lower limb bones have been used to explain higher lower limb loading activities in populations of hunter-gatherers, compared to agriculture or industrial populations, as well as to elucidate possible division of labor among males and females within and across different populations (Ruff, 1987;Bridge, 1989;Nakatsukasa, 1990;Wescott, 2006;Marchi, 2008;Ruff and Larsen, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Οι γεωμετρικές παράμετροι της εγκάρσιας τομής της διάφυσης των μακρών οστών (CSG), όπως το εμβαδόν και οι δευτεροβάθμιες ροπές αδράνειας της επιφάνειας έχουν χρησιμοποιηθεί εκτενώς για τα μηχανικά φορτία, τα οποία εφαρμόζονται στις διαφύσεις των μακρών οστών Maggiano et al, 2008;Shackelford et al, 2013;Zaki et al, 2015). Οι CSG παράμετροι παρέχουν σχετικές με το σχήμα ποσοτικές μετρήσεις της μηχανικής απόδοσης του οστού, και οι οποίες σχετίζονται με την αντοχή του σε δυνάμεις κάμψης (Ruff et al, 1993).…”
Section: μια καινοτόμος μέθοδος για την γεωμετρική ανάλυση της εγκάρσιας τομής της διάφυσης των μακρών οστώνunclassified