2002
Cross‐cultural mentoring as a context for learning
Abstract: Cross-cultural mentoring relationships are an important site of struggle for learning and for power. We use the example of one mentoring relationship to illustrate six common issues facing people involved in these relationships.Mentoring across cultural boundaries is an especially delicate dance that juxtaposes group norms and societal pressures and expectations with individual personality traits. Why would you choose to traverse such tumultuous territory, and how do you survive the journey? In our own success…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
63
4
1
1
Citation Types
0
37
0
0
Year Published
2003
2025
Publication Types
Select...
49
9
9
Relationship
0
67
Authors
Journals
Cited by 67 publications
(37 citation statements)
References 16 publications
0
37
0
0
“…Thus, DMRs can offer unique insights/challenges for mentors with regards to their own power/privilege. Moreover, as Johnson-Bailey and Cervero (2002) recommends, mentors and mentees in diversified pairs can co-mentor, share power, engage in dialog, be authentic, and transparent to develop sustainable relationships.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, DMRs can offer unique insights/challenges for mentors with regards to their own power/privilege. Moreover, as Johnson-Bailey and Cervero (2002) recommends, mentors and mentees in diversified pairs can co-mentor, share power, engage in dialog, be authentic, and transparent to develop sustainable relationships.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research further suggests that by participating in peer-mentor programs and engaging with multiple mentors, protégées have the potential to expand their career benefits more than those with one mentor (van Emmerik, 2004). In short, mentoring is an important part of “building a diverse and strong academy” (Johnson-Bailey and Cervero, 2002, p. 15). If this is a goal of the academy, then providing collaborative peer-mentoring opportunities is one avenue to reach that goal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“……”
Section: Social Communitymentioning
confidence: 93%
