Cross-cultural differences in the character strength of citizenship in South Africa

Abstract

The psychological conceptualisation of the character strength of citizenship as a trait ubiquitous across cultures is examined within the context of a diverse South African sample. The theoretically supposed elements common to the definition of citizenship as a dispositional trait (rather than a situational or cultural phenomenon) are examined by means of considering Peterson and Seligman's (2004) conceptualisation of citizenship as espoused in their work on character strength and virtues. Using the Rasch model of item response theory the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) Value in Action Inventory (VIA) Citizenship scale was examined for fit and differential item functioning (DIF). A diverse sample of 902 South African university students who completed the Citizenship scale was examined for DIF as a function of self-asserted ethnicities and home language groups, which serve as indicators of culture within the South African context. The findings of the study suggest that while certain conceptual aspects of trait-based citizenship as espoused by Peterson and Seligman (2004) are common across the heterogeneous cultures (as defined by ethnicity and language group) examined, there is sound evidence that there are also qualitative distinctions that are exclusively a function of cultural grouping, suggesting difficulties with the exclusive conceptualisation of citizenship as an individual trait. The implications of these findings speak to the importance of considering citizenship as a nuanced and complex notion that requires further consideration in terms of the philosophical, theoretical and empirical qualification of its conceptualisation. IntroductionThe concept of citizenship has been debated and discussed by scholars from numerous disciplines, including PINS, 2015PINS, , 48, 22 -44, http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2309PINS, -8708/2015 psychology (Dahlsgaard, Peterson & Seligman, 2005). At the broadest level, citizenship is linked to concepts such as membership and belonging. Although it was initially linked to belonging to a specific nation state, in recent times understandings of citizenship have moved beyond simplistic linkages with nation states to the idea that citizenship can be related to belonging to any grouping (Barnes, Auburn & Lea, 2004;Hamilton, 2009). Within psychology, citizenship has recently been conceptualised as one of the trait like character strengths identified by Peterson and Seligman (2004) and as such forms part of the growing positive psychology movement. This study examined this particular conceptualisation of citizenship within the South African context, making use of Peterson and Seligman's (2004: 13) seminal conceptualisation of citizenship as a trait-like construct that is "ubiquitously recognized and valued". It is acknowledged that despite the prominence of Peterson and Seligman's (2004) conceptualisation of citizenship other, contrasting, notions exist within psychology that view citizenship as being more situationally and culturally, rather than dispositionally, ...

Exploring the implications of cultural diversity for environmental learning at an African aquarium

“…South African society is considered to be multicultural, multilingual and multi-ethnic (du Plessis & Saccaggi, 2015). Research by Valchev et al, (2013) suggests that the speakers of the 11 languages could be meaningfully grouped into three ethno-cultural groups: Black African, White, and Coloured and Indian (or Asian).…”

Business values as a strategic resource in indigenous black South African family businesses

“…In this study, an IBSA family business refers to a business that is independently owned and managed by (an) IBSA(s), excluding South Africans from the mixed race and Indian population groups. The mixed race and Indian population groups were excluded because of differences in their value and cultural systems to that of the black African population (Du Plessis et al, 2015). To qualify for selection, the following criteria (Habbershon et al, 2010) were applied to the business family:…”

Transgenerational value transmission in business-owning families: an indigenous African perspective

“…In addition to these criteria, the business had to be independently owned and managed by an IBSA business-owning family, excluding members from the Coloured and Indian population groups. The exclusion of these groups is justified because their value and cultural systems differ vastly from that of the Black African population (Du Plessis et al, 2015). After identifying the family businesses, we contacted representatives and sought permission for their participation.…”