2003
DOI: 10.1179/146431503790560745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-cultural definitions of inclusion for deaf students: a comparative analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, no information on parental background and preference of oral versus sign language in home communication was gathered. One account for the large proportion of students with CI in special settings in Greece can be attributed to the country’s long tradition for separate schools for the deaf and also to a lack of support for inclusion among involved parties, such as ToDs, parents, governmental agencies, and the deaf community (Foster et al, 2003). Also, the lack of specialized personnel and support services for students with disabilities in the recent past may have constrained the integration of deaf students in mainstream schools (Lampropoulou & Padeliadu, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, no information on parental background and preference of oral versus sign language in home communication was gathered. One account for the large proportion of students with CI in special settings in Greece can be attributed to the country’s long tradition for separate schools for the deaf and also to a lack of support for inclusion among involved parties, such as ToDs, parents, governmental agencies, and the deaf community (Foster et al, 2003). Also, the lack of specialized personnel and support services for students with disabilities in the recent past may have constrained the integration of deaf students in mainstream schools (Lampropoulou & Padeliadu, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Greece, according to a survey from the Special Education Office in 1994, students with hearing impairment or deafness were found to be educated mostly in schools for the deaf, namely both residential and day schools for the deaf and hard-of-hearing (89.9%) and less in inclusive units where students with hearing impairment are attending special units in mainstream schools and are partly integrated (10.1%) with hearing peers in classes or other school activities (Foster et al, 2003). Based on the current legislature (Greek Legislation on Special Education Policies, 2008), students in the inclusive unit may receive specialized group or individual programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some authors [5][6][7] believe that inclusion is only achieved when deaf pupils are placed in mainstream classes with hearing pupils and are involved in all aspects of school life, other authors [8], on the other hand, believe that inclusion is only achieved when deaf pupils are placed in mainstream classes with hearing pupils and are involved in all aspects of school life, on the other hand, consider that inclusion can only be achieved when the education of deaf pupils takes place within specialised programmes and separately from hearing pupils, by better addressing their communication and language needs, socialisation and cultural identity.…”
Section: Situation Of Deaf People In Spain: State Of the Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussions of inclusivity in the research literature have generally centred on Northern constructs of inclusive societies, spaces, and schools for deaf people (Brennan 2003, Doherty 2012, Foster et al 2003, Ladd 2003, Powers 2002. In these contexts where childhood deafness is picked up at birth, where inclusive mainstream and special school education coexist, and where sign language interpreters, and education and health professionals are appropriately qualified, the debates around inclusion generally centre on the preservation and protection of the linguistic and cultural identity of deaf people, and inclusion as a societal response to diversity.…”
Section: The Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%