2001
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.281961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cronyism and Capital Controls: Evidence From Malaysia

Abstract: , and participants at the MIT Macroeconomics lunch, the NBER conference on the Malaysian Currency Crisis, the NBER corporate finance program spring 2001 meeting, and Brigham Young University. We also thank several Malaysian colleagues for sharing their insights off the record. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
269
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(284 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
13
269
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Crony capitalism also suggests that political leaders use their power to create rents for their families' and relatives' businesses. Empirical evidence supporting these predictions prevails both in the US and other countries (e.g., Agrawal and Knoeber 2001, Krozner and Stratmann 1998, Goldman, Rocholl, and So 2009, Cooper, Gulen, and Ovtchinnikov 2010, Fisman, 2001, Hellman, Jones and Kaufmann 2000, Johnson and Mitton 2002, Faccio 2006). For example, using an event study approach, Fisman (2001) and Faccio (2006) show that political connections are positively associated with firm value, which Faccio, Masulis, and McConnell (2006) and Claessens, Feijen, and Laeven (2008) suggest arises from preferred access to credit, regulatory favours, and government financial assistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Crony capitalism also suggests that political leaders use their power to create rents for their families' and relatives' businesses. Empirical evidence supporting these predictions prevails both in the US and other countries (e.g., Agrawal and Knoeber 2001, Krozner and Stratmann 1998, Goldman, Rocholl, and So 2009, Cooper, Gulen, and Ovtchinnikov 2010, Fisman, 2001, Hellman, Jones and Kaufmann 2000, Johnson and Mitton 2002, Faccio 2006). For example, using an event study approach, Fisman (2001) and Faccio (2006) show that political connections are positively associated with firm value, which Faccio, Masulis, and McConnell (2006) and Claessens, Feijen, and Laeven (2008) suggest arises from preferred access to credit, regulatory favours, and government financial assistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It focuses on the value for specific firms of different types of connections, which include campaign contributions (Classens et al 2008), personal relationships (Amore and Bennedsen, 2013;Johnson and Mitton, 2003), political party membership (Khwaja and Mian, 2005), and the revolving doors (Faccio, 2006, Luechinger andMoser, 2014).…”
Section: Revolving Door Political Connections and Firms' Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, some empirical studies find that the benefits of political connections are i) an easier access to financial resources such as bank loans or others funds at more convenient conditions (Charumilind et al, 2006;Claessens et al, 2008;Fraser et al, 2006;Khwaja and Mian, 2005;Li et al, 2008); ii) a build up confidence in the legal system (Li et al, 2008); iii) an improved performance (Johnson and Mitton, 2003); iv) a higher probability of being bailed out ; v) an increase in firm value by, for example, increasing its stock value (Goldman et al, 2009), and vi) a lower cost of equity capital (Boubakri et al, 2012). On the other hand, some studies find negative impacts of being politically connected firms such as i) lower quality of accounting information (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%