2002
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.76.12.6138-6146.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Role for Env as well as Gag-Pol in Control of a Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus 89.6P Challenge by a DNA Prime/Recombinant Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Vaccine

Abstract: Cellular immune responses against epitopes in conserved GagRecently, vaccines designed to raise cellular immunity have controlled virulent challenges and prevented the development of AIDS in rhesus macaques (2,4,5,20,22). These vaccines have been based on immunization with DNA adjuvanted with interleukin-2 (5), DNA immunizations boosted with recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (rMVA) (DNA/rMVA vaccine) (2), vesicular stomatitis virus vectors (20), rMVA vectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
98
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
98
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4f). Although we were not able to consistently induce broad responses to other SHIV proteins by these vaccines, our results lend support to the concept that this should be advantageous (2). It would ultimately also be insightful to immunize macaques against a B subtype SHIV and then challenge with a subtype AE SHIV; however, such virus constructs are not available at present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…4f). Although we were not able to consistently induce broad responses to other SHIV proteins by these vaccines, our results lend support to the concept that this should be advantageous (2). It would ultimately also be insightful to immunize macaques against a B subtype SHIV and then challenge with a subtype AE SHIV; however, such virus constructs are not available at present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Neutralization titers were negative on the day of challenge and 4 wk after challenge, became detectable by wk 8, and increased with time in some of the animals. The similar timing of the development of this response in group 1, 2, and 3 vaccinated animals compared with group 4 and historic controls excludes priming of neutralizing Abs by the vaccination regimen (61)(62)(63)(64). After wk 45, titers of neutralizing Ab increased in only a few animals of groups 1, 3, and 4.…”
Section: Protection From Shiv Infection And/or Simian Aids After Mucomentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This view stems from demonstrations that the passive transfer of broadly cross-reactive, neutralizing antienvelope antibodies affords sterilizing protection in nonhuman primate models for HIV infection (1)(2)(3). Moreover, certain vaccine strategies are more effective in suppressing infection in nonhuman primate models when viral envelope is included in the vaccine (4,5). Recent evidence indicates that anti-envelope antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity activity correlates with protection against HIV challenge (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%