2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0001867800004158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical markov branching process limit theorems allowing infinite variance

Abstract: This paper gives easy proofs of conditional limit laws for the population size Z t of a critical Markov branching process whose offspring law is attracted to a stable law with index 1 + α, where 0 ≤ α ≤ 1. Conditioning events subsume the usual ones, and more general initial laws are considered. The case α = 0 is related to extreme value theory for the Gumbel law.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For limit theorems of critical branching processes (single type or multitype) without the finite second moment condition, one can see, for instance [20,44,51,52,53,54] and the references therein.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For limit theorems of critical branching processes (single type or multitype) without the finite second moment condition, one can see, for instance [20,44,51,52,53,54] and the references therein.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] proved a conditional limit theorem for f (s) satisfying (1.4) with α = 0. Recently, Pakes [8] generalized the above results to continuous time Markov branching process. The proofs given in [8], based on Karamata's theory for regular varying functions, are much easier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…When α = 1, it gives the well-known standard exponential law. For more information on Linnik Law, we refer readers to [8,Section 4] and references therein.…”
Section: Remark 1 the Stationary-excess Operation Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(For a detailed account on the critical Markov branching processes under weaker moment conditions see [11]. )…”
Section: Lemma 18mentioning
confidence: 99%