1978
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.17.3602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical exponents for the Lifshitz point:εexpansion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
39
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting series expansions, given in Eqs. ͑84͒-͑88͒, correct earlier results by Mukamel 28 and Hornreich and Bruce; 29 for the special values mϭ2 and mϭ6, we recovered Sak and Grest's 30 findings. To clarify this long-standing controversy, it proved useful to work directly in position space and to compute the Laurent expansion of the dimensionally regularized distributions associated with the Feynman diagrams.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The resulting series expansions, given in Eqs. ͑84͒-͑88͒, correct earlier results by Mukamel 28 and Hornreich and Bruce; 29 for the special values mϭ2 and mϭ6, we recovered Sak and Grest's 30 findings. To clarify this long-standing controversy, it proved useful to work directly in position space and to compute the Laurent expansion of the dimensionally regularized distributions associated with the Feynman diagrams.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…2,32,33 Unfortunately, the ⑀-expansion results to order ⑀ 2 one group of authors 1,28,29 obtained for the correlation exponents l2 and l4 and the wave-vector exponent ␤ q are in conflict with those of Sak and Grest 30 for the cases mϭ2 and mϭ6. In order to resolve this long-standing controversy, Mergulhão and Carneiro 17,18 recently presented a reanalysis of the problem based on renormalized field theory and dimensional regularization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should not be surprising that the approach fails to describe the d = m = 8 case, for the exponent η L2 is divergent as can be seen from equation (21). The approximation made is not suitable for general isotropic cases d = m = 8 as well, since there is no longer any preferred direction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constraint introduced along the m-dimensional subspace is equivalent to expanding around the theory without competition, by varying the space dimension d, with m kept fixed. This is the main difference between the approach described here and other proposals [21][22][23]. The first calculation for the critical index η L2 for general m( =d) was performed [20] using the method of momentum shell integration based on the Hamiltonian formalism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%