2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00069-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
265
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 428 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
265
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This is unlike the cranial vault in which E 1 and E 2 are often similar and less in magnitude than E 3 (Peterson and Dechow, 2003). The cranial vault is unusual in this regard in that elastic properties superficially resemble the transverse isotropy of postcranial long bones (Katz and Meunier, 1987;Cowin and Hart, 1989;Weiner et al, 1999;Wirtz et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is unlike the cranial vault in which E 1 and E 2 are often similar and less in magnitude than E 3 (Peterson and Dechow, 2003). The cranial vault is unusual in this regard in that elastic properties superficially resemble the transverse isotropy of postcranial long bones (Katz and Meunier, 1987;Cowin and Hart, 1989;Weiner et al, 1999;Wirtz et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The evolution of the fracture is defined by the tensile and compressive plastic strains which define how the yielded material is spread after the ultimate strength is reached. Values for the density and elastic modulus for healthy, non-osteoporotic cortical and trabecular bone were taken from the literature [25,27,[30][31][32]. Young's modulus for osteoporotic bone was calculated by reducing the corresponding values of Young's modulus for healthy cortical and trabecular bone by 32% and 66% respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An elastic modulus was subsequently assigned to each element based on 1) a previously published density-elasticity relationship (Figure 3-3a), or 2) density-elasticity relationships obtained through optimization (see Density-Elasticity Equations and Optimization). The Poisson's ratio for all elements was set to 0.3 in accordance with previous FE models of human bone (8,164,207,208). The boundary conditions of the FE models replicated the mechanical tests.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%