2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1711-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical care at the end of life: a population-level cohort study of cost and outcomes

Abstract: BackgroundDespite the high cost associated with ICU use at the end of life, very little is known at a population level about the characteristics of users and their end of life experience. In this study, our goal was to characterize decedents who received intensive care near the end of life and examine their overall health care use prior to death.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study that examined all deaths in a 3-year period from April 2010 to March 2013 in Ontario, Canada. Using population-based healt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ottawa Hospital uses a standardized case-costing methodology that was developed by the Ontario Case Costing Initiative and is based on the Canadian Institute for Health Information Management Information Systems guidelines [ 22 ]. Costs were then indexed (to 2018 Canadian dollars) using consumer price indices [ 13 , 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ottawa Hospital uses a standardized case-costing methodology that was developed by the Ontario Case Costing Initiative and is based on the Canadian Institute for Health Information Management Information Systems guidelines [ 22 ]. Costs were then indexed (to 2018 Canadian dollars) using consumer price indices [ 13 , 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to conclude this from our study, as the database is not granular enough to determine severity, but it is known the additional medications, personnel, and technology to manage a patient at the end of life is more costly. 26 In addition, if a patient developed a complication while in the hospital, their associated health-care costs almost doubled. Again, this makes sense given the nature of receiving more care correlating directly with increased costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After adjusting for characteristics of both the decedent and their informants, being provided with specialized palliative care made the largest difference in decedents' odds of having an AD. Given the substantial costs of acute care-focused end-of-life care to the system [32][33][34][35][36][37] and to patients and their loved ones, 35,38 this new evidence adds to the case for AD promotion as a means to provide more positive health-care experiences for dying patients and their loved ones while freeing up scarce health-care resources for other potential uses. In addition, these results provide a demographic profile of Nova Scotians for who efforts to promote AD use to date may have been relatively successful (i.e., those who are aged 85 or older and/or those living in nursing homes) versus relatively unsuccessful (i.e., those receiving the majority of their care in nonpalliative hospital settings, those who have not had postsecondary education and those whose nextof-kin are aged 65 or older).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%