1996
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1996)122:7(690)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria for Initiation of Slide, Rock, and Slide-Rock Rigid-Body Modes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
121
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
121
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Suggestions were to restrain equipment to reduce their damage (PAHO, 2004), although researchers demonstrated that even anchored equipment get damaged, and suggest that it may be more stable if they are left free standing (Makris and Zhang, 1999). The response of equipment to earthquakes can be sliding, slide-rocking, rocking or flying (Housner, 1963) depending on their geometry, static friction and ground acceleration (Shenton III, 1996), although, some researchers believe that frequency is also another factor that affects equipment stability (Achour, 2007).…”
Section: Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suggestions were to restrain equipment to reduce their damage (PAHO, 2004), although researchers demonstrated that even anchored equipment get damaged, and suggest that it may be more stable if they are left free standing (Makris and Zhang, 1999). The response of equipment to earthquakes can be sliding, slide-rocking, rocking or flying (Housner, 1963) depending on their geometry, static friction and ground acceleration (Shenton III, 1996), although, some researchers believe that frequency is also another factor that affects equipment stability (Achour, 2007).…”
Section: Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to 1996, the mode of rigid-body motion that prevailed has been determined by comparing the available static friction to the width-to-height ratio of the block, irrespective of the magnitude of the horizontal ground acceleration. At about the same time, Scalia and Sumbatyan (1996) and, independently, Shenton (1996) indicated that, in addition to pure sliding and pure rocking, there is a slide-rock mode and its manifestation depends not only on the width-to-height ratio and the static friction coefficient but also on the magnitude of the base acceleration.…”
Section: Condition For Initiation Of Rocking Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the system of axis shown, a positive acceleration will induce an initial negative rotation ( < 0). Adopting the notation introduced by Shenton (1996), let f x > 0 and f z > 0 be the horizontal and vertical reactions at the tip O袌 of the block. Dynamic equilibrium at this instant ( = 0) givesf…”
Section: Condition For Initiation Of Rocking Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a constant ground acceleration, the response mode of the rock shifts from pure sliding to sliding coupled with rocking, and then to pure rocking with increase in the coefficient of friction. For a rigid rectangular object placed on a rigid horizontal ground, Shenton (1996) obtained the relation between the constant horizontal ground acceleration and the coefficient of friction required to initiate rocking, sliding, and coupled rocking-sliding of the object. He observed that for a ground excitation amplitude greater than the quasi-static toppling acceleration of the object, it can undergo pure sliding only for friction coefficients below its width-to-height ratio.…”
Section: Effect Of Friction Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%