2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2022.106616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coxiella burnetii and Chlamydia spp. coinfection in small ruminant abortion in Portugal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study evidences that co-infections in clinical cases of abortion are relatively frequent in small ruminants, as it has been demonstrated in recent studies ( 21 , 38 ). However, based on the semiquantitative results provided by Cq values, we observed that in most cases a single microorganism was detected in a sufficiently high concentration to be considered as potential causative agent of the abortion by itself, unlike in digestive or respiratory processes, in which more than one pathogen are frequently involved ( 39 41 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This study evidences that co-infections in clinical cases of abortion are relatively frequent in small ruminants, as it has been demonstrated in recent studies ( 21 , 38 ). However, based on the semiquantitative results provided by Cq values, we observed that in most cases a single microorganism was detected in a sufficiently high concentration to be considered as potential causative agent of the abortion by itself, unlike in digestive or respiratory processes, in which more than one pathogen are frequently involved ( 39 41 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is in line with a study conducted in Spain and Portugal on 1600 small ruminant abortions: C. burnetii and C. abortus are the most common abortifacient agents, with approximately 75% of abortion cases testing positive for both pathogens, followed by Toxoplasma gondii, Campylobacter sp., Salmonella enterica, Border Disease virus, and Neospora caninum [35]. In addition, another Portuguese study described a relevant presence of co-infection of C. abortus and C. burnetii in small flocks of ruminants [10]. This association seems to be the same in large ruminants: a study conducted in Bosnia and Herzegovina in cattle dairy farms found a high correlation (gamma = 0.73, herd level) between C. abortus and C. burnetii co-infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This resistance, as for C. burnetii, seems to increase the possibility of coming into contact with many animal species, farmed or wild, and with humans [1,3]. Referring to the literature data on PCR-based methods, co-infections in clinical cases of abortion are relatively frequent in small ruminants [8][9][10]. Taking the results published in an authors' previous study on the seroprevalence of Q fever [11] structured on a well-defined study design to accurately estimate the prevalence of the infection [12] as a starting point and considering the direct evidence of co-infections based on biomolecular methods [8][9][10], in this study, we propose a retrospective seroprevalence study on sheep and goat serum samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. burnetii plus C. abortus was the most common mixed infection, with both being the only pathogens reported in approximately one third of the cases testing positive for C. burnetii . Both bacteria have been reported to impact significantly upon Portuguese sheep and goat farms, where a significant proportion of abortion cases tested positive for C. abortus (34.2%), C. burnetii (15.1%) and co-infections between both pathogens (16.4%) [ 61 ]. In Italy, 11.3% of fetuses and 11.8% samples of ovine placenta yielded positive PCR results for two or more infectious agents [ 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%