2020
DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19 salivary signature: diagnostic and research opportunities

Abstract: The COVID-19 (caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)) epidemic started in Wuhan (Hubei Province, China) in mid-December 2019 and quickly spread across the world as a pandemic. As a key to tracing the disease and to implement strategies aimed at breaking the chain of disease transmission, extensive testing for SARS-CoV-2 was suggested. Although nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs are the most commonly used biological samples for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, they have a number of limitati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
1
9

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
77
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of saliva to detect SARS-CoV-2 has been extensively analyzed by different authors, showing that saliva can be used as an alternative sample to nasopharyngeal swabs for COVID-19 molecular diagnosis [9,10]. The sensitivity found in their studies varied from 81% to 100% [11,12,[17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of saliva to detect SARS-CoV-2 has been extensively analyzed by different authors, showing that saliva can be used as an alternative sample to nasopharyngeal swabs for COVID-19 molecular diagnosis [9,10]. The sensitivity found in their studies varied from 81% to 100% [11,12,[17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, publications have been shown a similar sensitivity between saliva samples and nasal swabs collected by health-care workers and those collected by a patient for COVID-19 molecular diagnosis, thus providing an important background for the choice of this strategy for surveillance of COVID-19 [6][7][8]. Saliva sampling has been described as a good alternative for SARS-CoV-2 detection, showing additional advantages compared to swab collection [9][10][11][12]. Saliva collection does not cause discomfort or nasal bleeding to patients and does not require swab collectors or personal protective equipment, which are currently in short-supply in the market [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…secondly, presence in the blood and gingival crevicular fluid; and thirdly, through salivary gland infection, with subsequent release of viral particles into the saliva via salivary ducts (10,24,25). It is believed that the highest viral concentration observed in saliva is is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in (which was not certified by peer review) preprint…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copyright holder for this this version posted October 27, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020. 10…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation