2022
DOI: 10.5152/mnm.2022.221488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19: Climacteric Symptomatology and Quality of Life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most women are unaware of alternative measures to reduce symptoms and prevent injuries. Faced with the limitation of conventional treatments and the side effects that often do not outweigh the riskbenefit, it becomes a challenge for health services to incorporate complementary and safe techniques to provide a better quality of life for this public, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic [6,13].…”
Section: Global Journal Of Reproductive Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, most women are unaware of alternative measures to reduce symptoms and prevent injuries. Faced with the limitation of conventional treatments and the side effects that often do not outweigh the riskbenefit, it becomes a challenge for health services to incorporate complementary and safe techniques to provide a better quality of life for this public, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic [6,13].…”
Section: Global Journal Of Reproductive Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collection took place in three evaluation moments, forming three study groups: BSI Group, composed of 62 women who were interviewed in person from January to March 2020 by the researcher at Basic Health Units in the city of Aracaju, Brazil; The DSI group, made up of 282 women, residing in different regions of Brazil, invited to participate in the survey through an electronic form between June and September 2020, and the PSI group, made up of 62 women, were invited to participate in this survey in the period from June to December 2022, in the same way as the DSI group. The entire sample consisted of 406 women and had its sample based on the work of Leyte et al [13].…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%