2006
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200501554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covalent Microcontact Printing of Proteins for Cell Patterning

Abstract: We describe a straightforward approach to the covalent immobilization of cytophilic proteins by microcontact printing, which can be used to pattern cells on substrates. Cytophilic proteins are printed in micropatterns on reactive self-assembled monolayers by using imine chemistry. An aldehyde-terminated monolayer on glass or on gold was obtained by the reaction between an amino-terminated monolayer and terephthaldialdehyde. The aldehyde monolayer was employed as a substrate for the direct microcontact printing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
117
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
117
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability of phospholipid layers to limit nonspecifi c binding has been exploited in combination with patterned arrays of soluble proteins (Kung et al 2000), whilst other approaches have combined the peptide with the lipid itself (Svedhem et al 2003) or printed proteins onto a reactive SAM (Rozkiewicz et al 2006). Incorporation of functional synthetic peptides into SAM is straightforward and patterning has been achieved by micro-contact printing ethylene glycol-terminated SAM in patterns leaving exposed gold for subsequent peptide assembly (Zhang et al 1999).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of phospholipid layers to limit nonspecifi c binding has been exploited in combination with patterned arrays of soluble proteins (Kung et al 2000), whilst other approaches have combined the peptide with the lipid itself (Svedhem et al 2003) or printed proteins onto a reactive SAM (Rozkiewicz et al 2006). Incorporation of functional synthetic peptides into SAM is straightforward and patterning has been achieved by micro-contact printing ethylene glycol-terminated SAM in patterns leaving exposed gold for subsequent peptide assembly (Zhang et al 1999).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most often used traditional method for cell patterning is based on microcontact printing. [8][9][10] In this method, extracellular matrix proteins, such as actin, fibronectin, and collagen are grafted onto a biocompatible, but bio-passivated, substrate in a pre-defined pattern utilizing a master mold, such as a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) stamp with corresponding micron-scale features. Due to the bio-adhesive nature of these proteins, cells would be attracted to, and grow on, these areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…73 Composite stamps produced from two UV-curable materials, 72 and poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate, were used to perform μCP of polar biomolecules. 78 μCP has been used to direct the adsorption of cells on surfaces. [75][76][77] For example HeLa cells were patterned using the interaction with patterned Col3a1 protein.…”
Section: Figure 13 Schematic Illustration Of the Fabrication Of Topmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[75][76][77] For example HeLa cells were patterned using the interaction with patterned Col3a1 protein. 78 Silicon oxide substrates were modified with amino-terminated SAMs and then the amino groups were converted into aldehyde groups by the reaction with terephthaldialdehyde. 79 Substrates modified in this manner can be directly patterned with collagen-like proteins by microcontact printing using a PDMS stamp ( Figure 1.4a).…”
Section: Figure 13 Schematic Illustration Of the Fabrication Of Topmentioning
confidence: 99%