2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling, decoupling and metasomatism: Evolution of crust–mantle relationships beneath NW Spitsbergen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(91 reference statements)
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Xenoliths from Spitsbergen have been extensively studied previously, and the SCLM in this locality has a well-defined metasomatic history (Amundsen et al, 1987;Griffin et al, 2012;Ionov et al, 2002a;Ionov et al, 2002b).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Xenoliths from Spitsbergen have been extensively studied previously, and the SCLM in this locality has a well-defined metasomatic history (Amundsen et al, 1987;Griffin et al, 2012;Ionov et al, 2002a;Ionov et al, 2002b).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ measurements of Os isotopes in xenolith-hosted sulfides have shown that there is a marked contrast in the extent and timing of metasomatism on either side of the BB fault Griffin et al, 2012). The xenoliths from Sigurdfjell and Halvdanpiggen, on the eastern side, consistently give younger ages than do the sulfides in xenoliths from Sverrefjell .…”
Section: Regional Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations