2015
DOI: 10.1038/nmat4500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting electrons on supported nanoparticles

Abstract: Electronic interactions between metal nanoparticles and oxide supports control the functionality of nanomaterials, for example, the stability, the activity and the selectivity of catalysts. Such interactions involve electron transfer across the metal/support interface. In this work we quantify this charge transfer on a well-defined platinum/ceria catalyst at particle sizes relevant for heterogeneous catalysis. Combining synchrotron-radiation photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning tunnelling microscopy and densit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
483
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 518 publications
(532 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(21 reference statements)
26
483
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While this led to good agreement between experiment and simulation and also to agreement with up to date literature about the direction of charge transfer 26 concerns have been raised about the validity of the approximation assuming a point-like tip and fixed electrical charges, in particular in the 25 presence of conductive samples, [27][28][29][30] and it was suggested to involve also van der Waals forces. 31 Most charges in the oxide support are fixed to defects, and in the metal nanoparticle the charges at the interface are largely immobilized by the attraction to the counter charge in close proximity across the interface, but there are mobile conduction electrons which render the particles polarizable by the applied voltage on the tip.…”
Section: Possible Effects Of the Finite Tip Size On The Kelvin Probe supporting
confidence: 74%
“…While this led to good agreement between experiment and simulation and also to agreement with up to date literature about the direction of charge transfer 26 concerns have been raised about the validity of the approximation assuming a point-like tip and fixed electrical charges, in particular in the 25 presence of conductive samples, [27][28][29][30] and it was suggested to involve also van der Waals forces. 31 Most charges in the oxide support are fixed to defects, and in the metal nanoparticle the charges at the interface are largely immobilized by the attraction to the counter charge in close proximity across the interface, but there are mobile conduction electrons which render the particles polarizable by the applied voltage on the tip.…”
Section: Possible Effects Of the Finite Tip Size On The Kelvin Probe supporting
confidence: 74%
“…5,8,33,34,41,42 is separated from its periodically repeated images in the neighboring unit cells in the three Cartesian directions by at least 0.9 nm to minimize the spurious particle-particle interactions. Γ-point calculations are performed.…”
Section: Models With Ceria Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common reason for the deactivation of copper‐based catalysts is metal nanoparticle sintering, which reduces the metallic surface area available for catalysis. Concerning the Cu/TiO 2 catalyst, no signs of severe sintering were observed, which we believe is owed to a strong metal–support interaction (SMSI),41, 42 or an electronic metal–support interaction (EMSI), as proposed by Lykhach et al 43. and Campbell 44.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%