2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1909.00066
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counterfactual Risk Assessments, Evaluation, and Fairness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After a period of theoretical research, a collaboration with the municipality of Amsterdam and Statistics Netherlands (CBS) was started in order to study a relevant problem with real data. After finishing the thesis 7 , the research continued as part of a project on fair algorithms. This project was carried out in a collaboration between CBS, municipality of Amsterdam, the University of Amsterdam, codefor.nl, the Association of Netherlands Municipalities (VNG) and other Dutch municipalities and was funded by the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (BZK).…”
Section: Acknowledgments and Disclosure Of Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After a period of theoretical research, a collaboration with the municipality of Amsterdam and Statistics Netherlands (CBS) was started in order to study a relevant problem with real data. After finishing the thesis 7 , the research continued as part of a project on fair algorithms. This project was carried out in a collaboration between CBS, municipality of Amsterdam, the University of Amsterdam, codefor.nl, the Association of Netherlands Municipalities (VNG) and other Dutch municipalities and was funded by the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (BZK).…”
Section: Acknowledgments and Disclosure Of Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wachter et al [43] and Mothilal et al [26] aim to generate a set of counterfactual input points which leads to a different outcome of the model, without explicitly modelling causal mechanisms among attributes. Coston et al [7] suggest using counterfactual data to evaluate models on counterfactual fairness, but do not account for unobserved confounders and focus on treatment based counterfactuals rather than path specific effects.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches require making untestable assumptions. Of particular note is the observation in Coston et al (2019) that fairness-adjustment procedures based on Y in settings with treatment effects may lead to adverse outcomes. To apply our method in such settings, we would need to match conditional counterfactual distributions, which could be a direction of future research.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%