Counter-Terrorism Law in the United Kingdom

Conte, Alex

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11608-7_8

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Wesley Wark admirably illustrates that, contrary to popular opinion, the CSIS–RCMP relationship was being successfully managed by the early 1990s but was made infinitely more complex because of the Stinchcombe ruling, which put at odds fundamental aspects of each agency’s mandate (Wark, 2010). 29 By contrast, New Zealand’s Bill of Rights Act is ‘neither entrenched or supreme’, and Australia does not have any equivalent federal human rights code (Conte, 2010), leaving executives in both states more legal manoeuvrability in security matters than exists in Canada.…”

Section: Intelligence Communities Defined By Differing National Audiencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The architecture of community: Intelligence community management in Australia, Canada and New Zealand

Brunatti

2012

Public Policy and Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While many have examined individual intelligence agencies and cooperation between agencies bilaterally, the study of the interdepartmental architecture that is meant to coordinate intelligence communities has been peripheral at best. This is especially true in the case of smaller states, such as Australia, Canada and New Zealand. However, this architecture is fundamentally important to our understanding of how the secret state operates; how it impacts, and is impacted by, the open state; and, when taken comparatively, is indicative of differing government cultures towards intelligence. Examination of the development of intelligence community management architecture in Australia, Canada and New Zealand reveals that actors in all three communities recognise networks of interdependency between them. However the extent to which they are able to exploit these interdependencies is dependent on larger dynamics in government, supporting the idea that intelligence communities can only be as cohesive as the governments they serve allow them to be.

show abstract

Section: Intelligence Communities Defined By Differing National Audiencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The architecture of community: Intelligence community management in Australia, Canada and New Zealand

Brunatti

2012

Public Policy and Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

States’ Prevention and Responses to the Phenomenon of Foreign Fighters against the Backdrop of International Human Rights Obligations

Conte

2016

Foreign Fighters Under International Law and Beyond

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

21st Populist Demagogues, Anti-Human Rights Candidatess and the Electorate: A Critical Analysis of the Fitness for Public Officee Rule from an International Human Rights Law Perspective.

Chengeta

2017

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Counter-Terrorism Law in the United Kingdom

Cited by 3 publications

References 5 publications

The architecture of community: Intelligence community management in Australia, Canada and New Zealand

The architecture of community: Intelligence community management in Australia, Canada and New Zealand

States’ Prevention and Responses to the Phenomenon of Foreign Fighters against the Backdrop of International Human Rights Obligations

21st Populist Demagogues, Anti-Human Rights Candidatess and the Electorate: A Critical Analysis of the Fitness for Public Officee Rule from an International Human Rights Law Perspective.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About