2015
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Utility and Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Telemedicine, Electronic, and Mobile Health Systems in the Literature: A Systematic Review

Abstract: There are few cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies for e-health and m-health systems in the literature. Some cost-effectiveness studies demonstrate that telemedicine can reduce the costs, but not all. Among the main limitations of the economic evaluations of telemedicine systems are the lack of randomized control trials, small sample sizes, and the absence of quality data and appropriate measures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
265
1
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 383 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
265
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Cost-effectiveness was influenced by the compliance rate, age of onset of diabetes and glycaemic control 3738 and inconclusive evidence for telemedicine in all fields due to small sample sizes, limited number of randomised trials and the poor quality of available studies 39. Similar to main findings from our review, a recent review of telemedicine for DR showed teleophthalmology screening to be most cost-effective when patient volume is high when compared with conventional examination regardless of the setting 40…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Cost-effectiveness was influenced by the compliance rate, age of onset of diabetes and glycaemic control 3738 and inconclusive evidence for telemedicine in all fields due to small sample sizes, limited number of randomised trials and the poor quality of available studies 39. Similar to main findings from our review, a recent review of telemedicine for DR showed teleophthalmology screening to be most cost-effective when patient volume is high when compared with conventional examination regardless of the setting 40…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This is in line with the necessity expressed by a number of participants to meticulously conceive the solutions/applications envisaged and come up with solid proof of cost-effectiveness [7]. There is indeed a paucity of cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies available within the field of mHealth [19]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Their availability and affordability depend most often on governmental investment or regulation. The need for a technical foundation is well acknowledged in a number of African countries’ National eHealth Strategies [15–18]*** and eHealth strategies [19]. The importance of this foundation is not trivial, since they are fundamental to working in the mobile digital environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this number of apps is increasing day by day. The rapid growth in mHealth apps has outpaced the science needed to validate the utility of health-related applications [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%